BACKGROUND: Chemotaxis may be studied in two main ways: 1) counting cells passing through an insert (e.g., using Boyden chambers), and 2) directly observing cell cultures (e.g., using Dunn chambers), both in response to stationary concentration gradients. This article promotes the use of Dunn chambers and in vitro cell-tracking, achieved by video microscopy coupled with automatic image analysis software, in order to extract quantitative and qualitative measurements characterizing the response of cells to a diffusible chemical agent. METHODS: Previously, we set up a videomicroscopy system coupled with image analysis software that was able to compute cell trajectories from in vitro cell cultures. In the present study, we are introducing a new software increasing the application field of this system to chemotaxis studies. This software is based on an adapted version of the active contour methodology, enabling each cell to be efficiently tracked for hours and resulting in detailed descriptions of individual cell trajectories. The major advantages of this method come from an improved robustness with respect to variability in cell morphologies between different cell lines and dynamical changes in cell shape during cell migration. Moreover, the software includes a very small number of parameters which do not require overly sensitive tuning. Finally, the running time of the software is very short, allowing improved possibilities in acquisition frequency and, consequently, improved descriptions of complex cell trajectories, i.e. trajectories including cell division and cell crossing. RESULTS: We validated this software on several artificial and real cell culture experiments in Dunn chambers also including comparisons with manual (human-controlled) analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We developed new software and data analysis tools for automated cell tracking which enable cell chemotaxis to be efficiently analyzed. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Chemotaxis may be studied in two main ways: 1) counting cells passing through an insert (e.g., using Boyden chambers), and 2) directly observing cell cultures (e.g., using Dunn chambers), both in response to stationary concentration gradients. This article promotes the use of Dunn chambers and in vitro cell-tracking, achieved by video microscopy coupled with automatic image analysis software, in order to extract quantitative and qualitative measurements characterizing the response of cells to a diffusible chemical agent. METHODS: Previously, we set up a videomicroscopy system coupled with image analysis software that was able to compute cell trajectories from in vitro cell cultures. In the present study, we are introducing a new software increasing the application field of this system to chemotaxis studies. This software is based on an adapted version of the active contour methodology, enabling each cell to be efficiently tracked for hours and resulting in detailed descriptions of individual cell trajectories. The major advantages of this method come from an improved robustness with respect to variability in cell morphologies between different cell lines and dynamical changes in cell shape during cell migration. Moreover, the software includes a very small number of parameters which do not require overly sensitive tuning. Finally, the running time of the software is very short, allowing improved possibilities in acquisition frequency and, consequently, improved descriptions of complex cell trajectories, i.e. trajectories including cell division and cell crossing. RESULTS: We validated this software on several artificial and real cell culture experiments in Dunn chambers also including comparisons with manual (human-controlled) analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We developed new software and data analysis tools for automated cell tracking which enable cell chemotaxis to be efficiently analyzed. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Dan Dominik Brüllmann; Andreas Pabst; Karl M Lehmann; Thomas Ziebart; Marc O Klein; Bernd d'Hoedt Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Rajib Chakravorty; David Rawlinson; Alan Zhang; John Markham; Mark R Dowling; Cameron Wellard; Jie H S Zhou; Philip D Hodgkin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Peter Bajcsy; Antonio Cardone; Joe Chalfoun; Michael Halter; Derek Juba; Marcin Kociolek; Michael Majurski; Adele Peskin; Carl Simon; Mylene Simon; Antoine Vandecreme; Mary Brady Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Smruti M Phadnis; Nathan O Loewke; Ivan K Dimov; Sunil Pai; Christine E Amwake; Olav Solgaard; Thomas M Baer; Bertha Chen; Renee A Reijo Pera Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 4.379