PURPOSE: To review use of the Cultural Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) and to summarize the cumulative findings. METHODS: A combination of literature searches and questionnaires to those who have requested the scale indicated 26 known uses. Fifteen reported sufficient data for statistical analysis. FINDINGS: Of the 26 known uses of the CSES, 8 were published in peer-reviewed journals, 5 in dissertations, 8 in theses, and 3 as data sets only. Two additional theses were not retrievable for the study. On a 5-point Likert-type scale, nurses reported the highest degree of self-efficacy with African American (3.1) and Hispanic (3.1) patients and the lowest with Asian American patients (2.4). Six of the reports include Cronbach's alpha coefficients, ranging from .86 to .98. In the final sample of 15 studies, nurses did not report feeling confident caring for patients from other cultures. CONCLUSIONS: Although the CSES has been used in many settings with over 3,000 nurses, inconsistencies in the data preclude specific conclusions. Further research is needed using consistent reporting practices and sufficient predictor variables to draw further conclusions regarding the scale's psychometric properties.
PURPOSE: To review use of the Cultural Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) and to summarize the cumulative findings. METHODS: A combination of literature searches and questionnaires to those who have requested the scale indicated 26 known uses. Fifteen reported sufficient data for statistical analysis. FINDINGS: Of the 26 known uses of the CSES, 8 were published in peer-reviewed journals, 5 in dissertations, 8 in theses, and 3 as data sets only. Two additional theses were not retrievable for the study. On a 5-point Likert-type scale, nurses reported the highest degree of self-efficacy with African American (3.1) and Hispanic (3.1) patients and the lowest with Asian American patients (2.4). Six of the reports include Cronbach's alpha coefficients, ranging from .86 to .98. In the final sample of 15 studies, nurses did not report feeling confident caring for patients from other cultures. CONCLUSIONS: Although the CSES has been used in many settings with over 3,000 nurses, inconsistencies in the data preclude specific conclusions. Further research is needed using consistent reporting practices and sufficient predictor variables to draw further conclusions regarding the scale's psychometric properties.