Literature DB >> 15227369

In vivo survival of red blood cells processed by a bubble or membrane oxygenator during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

J E Ansell1, T VanderSalm, W Stephenson, I Szymanski, L Fournier.   

Abstract

A dual radioisotope labeling technique was utilized to assess red cell survival differences between cells processed by either a bubble oxygenator (eight patients) or membrane oxygenator (eight patients) in 16 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Cells processed by a bubble oxygenator consistently had a shortened survival. The 30-minute recovery of cells was not significantly different between oxygenators in contradiction to some previous studies using plasma hemoglobin as an indicator of hemolysis. The results of this investigation confirm previous studies that a membrane oxygenator provides a survival advantage to red cells during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 15227369      PMCID: PMC324635     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  10 in total

1.  Two membrane oxygenators and a bubbler: a clinical comparison.

Authors:  M Boers; J J van den Dungen; G F Karliczek; U Brenken; J N van der Heide; C R Wildevuur
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Clinical study of blood trauma during perfusion with membrane and bubble oxygenators.

Authors:  J J van den Dungen; G F Karliczek; U Brenken; J N Homan van der Heide; C R Wildevuur
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Survival of autotransfused red blood cells recovered from the surgical field during cardiovascular operations.

Authors:  J Ansell; N Parrilla; M King; L Fournier; I Szymanski; P Doherty; T Vander Salm; B Cutler
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  A prospective randomized study of membrane versus bubble oxygenators in children.

Authors:  R M Sade; D M Bartles; J P Dearing; L J Campbell; C B Loadholt
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  The membrane versus bubble oxygenator controversy.

Authors:  E C Peirce
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Clinical comparison between membrane and bubble oxygenators in cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  G Fenchel; W Seybold-Epting; K Schmidt; R Stunkat; H E Hoffmeister
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1979 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.888

7.  Comparison of bubble and membrane oxygenators in short and long perfusions.

Authors:  R E Clark; R A Beauchamp; R A Magrath; J D Brooks; T B Ferguson; C S Weldon
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Erythrocyte survival following extracorporeal circulation. A question of membrane versus bubble oxygenator.

Authors:  C Tabak; J Eugene; E A Stemmer
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Membrane vs bubble oxygenators: a prospective study of 52 patients.

Authors:  G L Hicks; H H Zwart; R A DeWall
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1979-11

10.  Membrane versus bubble oxygenator for cardiac operations. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  E A Hessel; D D Johnson; T D Ivey; D W Miller
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 5.209

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.