Literature DB >> 15227188

Phonocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic response to balloon aortic valvuloplasty.

H S Bush1, J J Ferguson.   

Abstract

The time to systolic murmur peak is a clinical index that is useful in assessing the severity of valvular aortic stenosis. To determine whether phonocardiography could be used to detect a change in the timing of the murmur and thus to measure hemodynamic improvements in elderly balloon aortic valvuloplasty patients, we retrospectively reviewed phonocardiographic tracings of 18 patients taken before and after the procedure. Ten men and 8 women were included in the study; the mean age was 80.7 +/- 11.2 years (range, 64 to 90). Phonocardiographic signals were digitized, and the R-wave to murmur peak interval (R-MP) was measured. In 11 patients, the R-MP decreased (mean decrease, 16% +/- 11%): of these, 10 had a significant (> 25%) decrease in mean gradient; 10 had a significant (> 25%) decrease in peak-to-peak gradient; and the average increase in aortic valve area was 38%. Seven patients had an increase in R-MP (mean increase, 10% +/- 9%): of these, 6 had a decrease in mean gradient of less than 25%; 6 had a decrease in peak-to-peak gradient of less than 25%; and the average increase in aortic valve area was 21%. Pre- and post-balloon aortic valvuloplasty heart rates were not significantly different (71 +/- 8 beats/min versus 73 +/- 5 beats/min). In this study, hemodynamic improvements after valvuloplasty were manifested by a reduction in the R-MP interval. We conclude that phonocardiography may be a practical, noninvasive method of assessing the hemodynamic response to balloon aortic valvuloplasty.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 15227188      PMCID: PMC324899     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  9 in total

1.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I.

Authors:  R GORLIN; S G GORLIN
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Assessing the severity of aortic stenosis by phonocardiography and external carotid pulse recordings.

Authors:  A J Bonner; H N Sacks; M E Tavel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Noninvasive evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis in adults.

Authors:  M Nitta; T Nakamura; H N Hultgren; J Bilisoly; B Marquess
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Noninvasive tests to evaluate the severity of aortic stenosis. Limitations and reliability.

Authors:  A G Voelkel; M Kendrick; D A Pietro; A F Parisi; V Voelkel; D Greenfield; J Askenazi; E D Folland
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Assessment of site and severity in congenital aortic stenosis.

Authors:  C M Oakley; K A Hallidie-Smith
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1967-05

6.  Percutaneous transluminal valvuloplasty of acquired aortic stenosis in elderly patients: an alternative to valve replacement?

Authors:  A Cribier; T Savin; N Saoudi; P Rocha; J Berland; B Letac
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-01-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Progression of aortic stenosis in adult men. Detection by noninvasive methods.

Authors:  M Nitta; T Nakamura; H N Hultgren; J Bilisoly; D A Tovey
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Doppler evaluation of results of percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty in calcific aortic stenosis.

Authors:  R A Nishimura; D R Holmes; G S Reeder; T A Orszulak; J F Bresnahan; D M Ilstrup; A J Tajik
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve area in elderly patients with aortic stenosis and of changes in valve area after percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty.

Authors:  P C Come; M F Riley; R G McKay; R Safian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 24.094

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.