Literature DB >> 15226883

The noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle-branch block.

D W Rowe1, I Oquendo, E G Depuey, C M de Castro, E Garcia, J A Burdine, R J Hall.   

Abstract

The prognosis in patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB) is related primarily to the presence or absence of underlying cardiac disease. Because coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common underlying disease found in these patients, it would be desirable, in the presence of LBBB, to have a noninvasive method of differentiating between patients with and without CAD. We reviewed our experience in patients with LBBB who had undergone coronary arteriography with regard to electrocardiographic (ECG) stress testing, exercise radionuclide ventriculography (RNV), and exercise thallium scintigraphy; we also reviewed their clinical histories. A clinical history of typical angina pectoris was specific for CAD, a false-positive history being present in only one of 12 patients without CAD. The frequency of a positive ECG ST response to exercise was equal in patients with and without CAD. False-positive ejection fraction and wall-motion responses to exercise were frequent by RNV. A modification of the usual RNV criteria for positivity improved specificity but resulted in poor sensitivity for CAD. False-positive thallium study results also were. frequent in these patients. The perfusion defects usually involved the ventricular septum; the inferior and posterior walls were involved only in patients with CAD. We conclude that the usual noninvasive diagnostic tests for CAD are of limited value in patients with LBBB.

Entities:  

Year:  1982        PMID: 15226883      PMCID: PMC351658     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  25 in total

1.  A clinical and follow-up study of right and left bundle branch block.

Authors:  M Rotman; J H Triebwasser
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Paradoxical motion of interventricular septum in left bundle branch block.

Authors:  A S Abbasi; L M Eber; R N MacAlpin; A A Kattus
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Pathology of small coronary arteries.

Authors:  T N James
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Exercise test, history, and serum lipid levels in patients with chest pain and normal electrocardiogram at rest: comparison to findings at coronary arteriography.

Authors:  C A Ascoop; M L Simoons; W G Egmond; A V Bruschke
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Coronary arteriographic appearances in patients with left bundle-branch block.

Authors:  C M Lewis; G R Dagenais; G C Friesinger; R S Ross
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Benign left bundle branch block.

Authors:  T B Beach; J G Gracey; R H Peter; P W Grunenwald
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Thallium-20 1 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the clinical clarification of normal, abnormal and equivocal electrocardiographic stress tests.

Authors:  E H Botvinick; M R Taradash; D M Shames; W W Parmley
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  M-mode and cross-sectional echocardiographic study of the left ventricular wall motions in complete left bundle-branch block.

Authors:  J Fujii; H Wantanabe; T Watanabe; N Takahashi; A Ohta; K Kato
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1979-09

9.  Quantitative study of left bundle branch fibrosis in left anterior hemiblock: A stereologic approach.

Authors:  J C Demoulin; L J Simar; H E Kulbertus
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  De subitaneis mortibus. XXIX. Randomly distributed focal myocardial lesions causing destruction in the His bundle or a narrow-origin left bundle branch.

Authors:  T N James; R C Schlant; T K Marshall
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

1.  A 201T1 perfusion defect in a case with rate-dependent left bundle-branch block (LBBB).

Authors:  C Kurata; H Terada; T Fujii; R Fujita; Y Sasaki
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1985

2.  Usefulness of myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with left bundle branch block and previous myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Candell-Riera; G Oller-Martínez; O Pereztol-Valdés; J Castell-Conesa; S Aguadé-Bruix; M Soler-Peter; M Simó; C Santana-Boado; J Soler-Soler
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.994

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.