Literature DB >> 15226721

How often are spectacles prescribed to "normal" preschool children?

Sean P Donahue1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Legislation to require formal eye examination prior to school entry is being considered in several states and is supported by optical trade organizations. Pediatric ophthalmologists cite anecdotal cases that suggest children receive spectacles unnecessarily, but data to support this are lacking.
METHODS: Eye examination results from children referred to local eye doctors following a statewide preschool photoscreening program were reviewed to determine how often glasses were prescribed for children who did not have amblyogenic factors (those with false-positive screenings).
RESULTS: Of 102,508 preschool children screened, 890 children did not have amblyogenic factors (false-positive screenings). Nevertheless, spectacles were prescribed for 174 (19.5%) of these children. Only 5/272 children (1.8%) were prescribed glasses following examination by a pediatric ophthalmologist, while glasses were prescribed for 24/205 children (11.7%) examined by comprehensive ophthalmologists and 145/413 (35.1%) of children seen by optometrists (P < 0.001). Eighty children were prescribed glasses for refractive error ranging from -0.75 sph to +2.00 sph, 32 of whom had spherical equivalent of 1D or less.
CONCLUSIONS: While some preschoolers without amblyogenic factors may require spectacle correction, a significant percentage of children are probably prescribed glasses unnecessarily. Extrapolation of these data to the United States population suggests that a single mandatory eye examination prior to school entry could cost over 200,000,000 US dollars yearly for unnecessary spectacles. Vision screening programs with high referral rates, and health policy proposals supporting comprehensive preschool eye exams, must consider these unnecessary costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15226721     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  5 in total

1.  In the absence of strabismus what constitutes a visual deficit in children?

Authors:  S J Shea; L Gaccon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Corrective lens wear among adolescents: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; James G Gurney; Maya Eibschitz-Tsimhoni; Montea Del Monte
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.402

3.  The relationship between anisometropia, patient age, and the development of amblyopia.

Authors:  Sean P Donahue
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Interspecialty differences in the care of children with chronic or serious acute conditions: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michelle L Mayer; Asheley Cockrell Skinner; Gary L Freed
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 5.  Scope and costs of autorefraction and photoscreening for childhood amblyopia-a systematic narrative review in relation to the EUSCREEN project data.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Helen J Griffiths; Jill Carlton; Paolo Mazzone; Arinder Channa; Mandy Nordmann; Huibert J Simonsz
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.775

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.