Literature DB >> 15226337

Outcomes of a randomized trial of hyperfractionated cranial radiation therapy for treatment of high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: therapeutic efficacy and neurotoxicity.

Deborah P Waber1, Lewis B Silverman, Lori Catania, William Mautz, Montse Rue, Richard D Gelber, Donna E Levy, Meredith A Goldwasser, Heather Adams, Annie Dufresne, Victoria Metzger, Ivonne Romero, Nancy J Tarbell, Virginia Kimball Dalton, Stephen E Sallan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated 8-year survival and late neuropsychologic toxicity in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated in a randomized clinical trial to test whether hyperfractionated (twice daily) cranial radiation therapy (CRT) can reduce incidence and severity of late toxicities associated with 18 Gy of CRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1987 and 1995, 369 children treated on two consecutive Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Consortium protocols for high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia were randomly assigned to conventionally fractionated CRT (CFX) or hyperfractionated CRT (HFX) to a total dose of 18 Gy. Neuropsychologic testing was completed for 125 of 287 children in continuous complete remission. Event-free and overall survival, as well as neuropsychologic function, were compared for the two arms of the protocol.
RESULTS: Eight-year event-free survival (+/- SE) was 80% +/- 3% for children randomly assigned to CFX and 72% +/- 3% for HFX (P =.06). Overall survival was 85% +/- 3% for CFX and 78% +/- 3% for HFX (P =.06). CNS relapses occurred in 2.8% of patients receiving CFX and 2.7% receiving HFX (P =.99). Cognitive function for both groups was solidly in the average range, with no group differences in intelligence, academic achievement, visuospatial reasoning, or verbal learning. Children on the HFX arm exhibited a modest advantage for visual memory (P <.05).
CONCLUSION: HFX provides no benefit in terms of cognitive late effects and may compromise antileukemic efficacy. HFX should not be substituted for conventionally dosed CRT in children who require radiation therapy for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15226337     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  10 in total

Review 1.  Neuro-oncology in a nutshell.

Authors:  Joachim M Baehring
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Neuropsychological outcomes of standard risk and high risk patients treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia on Dana-Farber ALL consortium protocol 95-01 at 5 years post-diagnosis.

Authors:  Deborah P Waber; Jennifer Turek Queally; Lori Catania; Philippe Robaey; Ivonne Romero; Heather Adams; Cheryl Alyman; Christine Jandet-Brunet; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Anaplastic oligoastrocytoma: previous treatment as a possible cause in a child with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Necmettin Tanriover; Mustafa Onur Ulu; Mehmet Sar; Mustafa Uzan
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Neuropsychological outcomes of a randomized trial of prednisone versus dexamethasone in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: findings from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute All Consortium Protocol 00-01.

Authors:  Deborah P Waber; Marie McCabe; Mikaela Sebree; Peter W Forbes; Heather Adams; Cheryl Alyman; Stephen A Sands; Philippe Robaey; Ivonne Romero; Marie-Ève Routhier; Jonathan M Girard; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  Results of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ALL Consortium Protocol 95-01 for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Albert Moghrabi; Donna E Levy; Barbara Asselin; Ronald Barr; Luis Clavell; Craig Hurwitz; Yvan Samson; Marshall Schorin; Virginia K Dalton; Steven E Lipshultz; Donna S Neuberg; Richard D Gelber; Harvey J Cohen; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Cognitive Sparing during the Administration of Whole Brain Radiotherapy and Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation: Current Concepts and Approaches.

Authors:  James C Marsh; Benjamin T Gielda; Arnold M Herskovic; Ross A Abrams
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  Cognitive impairments following cranial irradiation can be mitigated by treatment with a tropomyosin receptor kinase B agonist.

Authors:  Phillip Yang; David Leu; Keqiang Ye; Chandra Srinivasan; John R Fike; Ting-Ting Huang
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 8.  Poor-risk high-grade gliomas in three survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia--an overview of causative factors and possible therapeutic options.

Authors:  Ewa Bien; Teresa Stachowicz-Stencel; Magdalena Szalewska; Malgorzata Krawczyk; Anna Synakiewicz; Miroslawa Dubaniewicz-Wybieralska; Piotr Zielinski; Elzbieta Adamkiewicz-Drozynska; Anna Balcerska
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Surgical treatment of refractory epilepsy after chemotherapy in two children with leukemia.

Authors:  Yun Leng; Tao Yu; Yongjie Li; Wenming Chen
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav Case Rep       Date:  2013-02-04

10.  Long-term brain structural magnetic resonance imaging and cognitive functioning in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia with high-dose methotrexate chemotherapy alone or combined with CNS radiotherapy at reduced total dose to 12 Gy.

Authors:  Olga Zając-Spychała; Mikołaj A Pawlak; Katarzyna Karmelita-Katulska; Jakub Pilarczyk; Katarzyna Derwich; Jacek Wachowiak
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.804

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.