Literature DB >> 15226166

Low-molecular-weight heparin as bridging anticoagulation during interruption of warfarin: assessment of a standardized periprocedural anticoagulation regimen.

James D Douketis1, Judith A Johnson, Alexander G Turpie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patients at increased risk for arterial thromboembolism who require temporary interruption of warfarin sodium therapy is a common clinical problem. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a standardized periprocedural anticoagulation regimen with low-molecular-weight heparin.
METHODS: We studied 650 consecutive patients with a mechanical heart valve, chronic atrial fibrillation, or embolic stroke who required interruption of warfarin therapy because of an invasive procedure. Warfarin was stopped 5 or 6 days before the procedure, and patients received subcutaneous dalteparin sodium, 100 IU/kg twice daily, starting 3 days before the procedure. The risk of postprocedural bleeding determined postprocedural anticoagulant management. In patients undergoing a non-high-bleeding-risk procedure who had adequate postprocedural hemostasis, warfarin was resumed on the evening of the procedure, and dalteparin sodium, 100 IU/kg twice daily, was resumed on the next day and continued until the international normalized ratio was 2.0 or more. If postprocedural hemostasis was not secured, the resumption of dalteparin was delayed. In patients undergoing a high-bleeding-risk procedure, warfarin was resumed on the evening of the procedure, but dalteparin was not given after the procedure.
RESULTS: Patients were followed up during the preprocedural and postprocedural period for a mean of 13.8 days (range, 10-18 days). In 542 patients who underwent a non-high-bleeding-risk procedure, there were 2 thromboembolic events (0.4%), 4 major bleeding episodes (0.7%), and 32 episodes of increased wound-related blood loss that precluded postprocedural dalteparin administration (5.9%). In 108 patients who underwent a high-bleeding-risk procedure, there were 2 deaths (1.8%) possibly due to thromboembolism and 2 major bleeding episodes (1.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients at increased risk for arterial thromboembolism who require temporary interruption of warfarin therapy, a standardized periprocedural anticoagulant regimen with low-molecular-weight heparin is associated with a low risk of thromboembolic and major bleeding complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15226166     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.12.1319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  54 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative care for patients with rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Bharath M Akkara Veetil; Tim Bongartz
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 2.  To bridge or not to bridge: these are the questions.

Authors:  Robert W Harrison; Thomas L Ortel; Richard C Becker
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  The management of patients who require temporary reversal of vitamin K antagonists for surgery: a practical guide for clinicians.

Authors:  Caterina Mannucci; James D Douketis
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  [Dysphagia after taking an acetaminophen-tablet during oral anticoagulation].

Authors:  K M Bauer; J Harenberg; I Jörg; P Diezler; K Reinshagen; H Burkhardt; R Gladisch
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  The duration of anticoagulation bridging therapy in clinical practice may significantly exceed that observed in clinical trials.

Authors:  Jacob P Deerhake; Julie C Merz; Jeanna V Cooper; Kim A Eagle; William P Fay
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  James D Douketis; Alex C Spyropoulos; Frederick A Spencer; Michael Mayr; Amir K Jaffer; Mark H Eckman; Andrew S Dunn; Regina Kunz
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 7.  [Bridging anticoagulation].

Authors:  S M Schellong; K Halbritter; S Haas
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Management of patients on long-term oral anticoagulant therapy undergoing elective surgery: survey of the clinical practice in the Italian anticoagulation clinics.

Authors:  F Baudo; F de Cataldo; G Mostarda; A Ghirarduzzi; M Molinatti; V Pengo; D Poli; A Tosetto; E Tiraferri; E Morra
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.397

9.  Outcomes of temporary interruption of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: results from the rivaroxaban once daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation (ROCKET AF).

Authors:  Matthew W Sherwood; James D Douketis; Manesh R Patel; Jonathan P Piccini; Anne S Hellkamp; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Alex C Spyropoulos; Graeme J Hankey; Daniel E Singer; Christopher C Nessel; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Keith A A Fox; Robert M Califf; Richard C Becker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  A Bridge to Nowhere? Benefits and Risks for Periprocedural Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Arun Krishnamoorthy; Thomas Ortel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.