Literature DB >> 15224055

Comparison of orthodontic and orthopedic effects of a modified maxillary protractor between deciduous and early mixed dentitions.

Keijirou Kajiyama1, Teruo Murakami, Akira Suzuki.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the maxillary protractor bow appliance (MPBA) on dentoalveolar structure and skeletal morphology in patients with Class III malocclusions in different dental stages. The sample consisted of 63 treated and 57 untreated Japanese patients who all had anterior crossbites. The former group was treated with MPBA and included 34 subjects with deciduous dentition (DT group) and 29 subjects with early mixed dentition (MT group). In the DT group, MPBA was used over a mean period of 5 months to obtain positive overjet, and, in the MT group, MPBA was used over a mean period of 10 months identically. Analysis of variance with 3 factors (appliance, treatment stage, sex) between treated and untreated subjects and unpaired t tests between DT and MT groups were performed from 2 lateral cephalograms before and after treatment to compare the dentofacial changes. The mechanisms of improving anterior crossbite were similar in both groups; however, the mean skeletal and dentoalveolar changes in the DT group were significantly greater than those in the MT group. The clinical effects of MPBA treatment were greater in the deciduous-dentition group than in the early-mixed-dentition group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15224055     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  19 in total

1.  Factors associated with long-term vertical skeletal changes induced by facemask therapy in patients with Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Hee-Jong Kwak; Hae-Jin Park; Yoon-Ji Kim; Dong-Yul Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Lucia Cevidanes; Tiziano Baccetti; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  3D soft tissue changes in facial morphology in patients with cleft lip and palate and class III mal occlusion under therapy with rapid maxillary expansion and delaire facemask.

Authors:  Claudia Sade Hoefert; Margit Bacher; Tina Herberts; Michael Krimmel; Siegmar Reinert; Gernot Göz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency.

Authors:  Hugo J De Clerck; Marie A Cornelis; Lucia H Cevidanes; Gavin C Heymann; Camilla J F Tulloch
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Skeletal Class III malocclusion with unilateral congenitally missing maxillary incisor treated by maxillary protractor and edgewise appliances.

Authors:  Masako Tabuchi; Hayato Fukuoka; Ken Miyazawa; Shigemi Goto
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction without rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Dong-Yul Lee; Eun-Soo Kim; Yong-Kyu Lim; Sug-Joon Ahn
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Cephalometric characteristics of Korean children with Class III malocclusion in the deciduous dentition.

Authors:  Hyung-Jun Choi; Ji-Yeon Kim; Seung Eun Yoo; Jang-Hyuk Kwon; Kitae Park
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Nonsurgical treatment of maxillary deficiency using tongue guard appliance: a case report.

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahrari; Neda Eslami
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2011-12-19

9.  Modified tandem traction bow appliance compared with facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.

Authors:  Tuba Tortop; Emine Kaygisiz; Deniz Gencer; Sema Yuksel; Zeynep Atalay
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 10.  Bone- and dentoalveolar-anchored dentofacial orthopedics for Class III malocclusion: new approaches, similar objectives? : a systematic review.

Authors:  Marta Morales-Fernández; Alejandro Iglesias-Linares; Rosa Maria Yañez-Vico; Asuncion Mendoza-Mendoza; Enrique Solano-Reina
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.