Literature DB >> 15224054

Cephalometric variables predicting the long-term success or failure of combined rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy.

Tiziano Baccetti1, Lorenzo Franchi, James A McNamara.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to select a model of cephalometric variables to predict the results of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by comprehensive treatment with fixed appliances. Lateral cephalograms of 42 patients (20 boys, 22 girls) with Class III malocclusion were analyzed at the start of treatment (mean age 8 years 6 months +/- 2 years, at stage I in cervical vertebral maturation). All patients were reevaluated after a mean period of 6 years 6 months (at stage IV or V in cervical vertebral maturation) that included active treatment plus retention. At this time, the sample was divided into 2 groups according to occlusal criteria: a successful group (30 patients) and an unsuccessful group (12 patients). Discriminant analysis was applied to select pretreatment predictive variables of long-term treatment outcome. Stepwise variable selection of the cephalometric measurements at the first observation identified 3 predictive variables. Orthopedic treatment of Class III malocclusion might be unfavorable over the long term when a patient's pretreatment cephalometric records exhibit a long mandibular ramus (ie, increased posterior facial height), an acute cranial base angle, and a steep mandibular plane angle. On the basis of the equation generated by the multivariate statistical method, the outcome of interceptive orthopedic treatment for each new patient with Class III malocclusion can be predicted with a probability error of 16.7%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15224054     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  22 in total

1.  Long-term stability of maxillary protraction therapy in Class III patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Yixin Zhang; Zhen Fu; Haichao Jia; Yiping Huang; Xiaobei Li; Hao Liu; Weiran Li
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Factors associated with long-term vertical skeletal changes induced by facemask therapy in patients with Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Hee-Jong Kwak; Hae-Jin Park; Yoon-Ji Kim; Dong-Yul Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Cephalometric variables used to predict the success of interceptive treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and face mask. A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Daniele Nóbrega Nardoni; Danilo Furquim Siqueira; Mauricio de Almeida Cardoso; Leopoldino Capelozza Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

4.  Stability of maxillary protraction therapy in children with Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yifan Lin; Runzhi Guo; Liyu Hou; Zhen Fu; Weiran Li
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Bonded versus banded rapid palatal expander followed by facial mask therapy: analysis on digital dental casts.

Authors:  Roberta Lione; Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Efisio Defraia; Lorenzo Franchi; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates.

Authors:  Gavin C Heymann; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie Cornelis; Hugo J De Clerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  A comparison of two different techniques for early correction of Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  J Seehra; P S Fleming; N Mandall; A T Dibiase
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Compensation of skeletal Class III malocclusion by isolated extraction of mandibular teeth: Part 2: Skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue parameters in comparison with nonextraction Class III therapies.

Authors:  Bernd Zimmer; Sarah Gaida; Henning Dathe
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Adult Class III treatment using a J-hook headgear to the mandibular arch.

Authors:  Yasuko Kuroda; Shingo Kuroda; Richard G Alexander; Eiji Tanaka
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Evaluation of Skeletal and Dental Effects of Modified Jasper Jumper Appliance and Delaire Face Mask with Pancherz Analysis.

Authors:  Hülya Kılıçoğlu; Nilüfer Yılmaz Öğütlü; Ceylan Alioğlu Uludağ
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.