OBJECTIVES: In order to prevent abnormalities of fetal growth still characterizing pregnancies complicated by Gestational Diabetes (GDM), in the present study we evaluated a therapeutic strategy for GDM based on ultrasound (US) measurement of fetal insulin-sensitive tissues. METHODS: All GDM women diagnosed before 28th week immediately started diet and self-monitoring of blood glucose; after 2 weeks they were randomized to conventional (C) or modified (M) management. In C the glycemic target (GT) was fixed at 90 fasting/120 post-prandial mg/dl; in M GT varied, according to US measurement of the Abdominal Circumference (AC) centile performed every 2 weeks: 80/100 if AC > or =75th, 100/140 if AC<75th. Therapy was tailored to mean fasting (FG) and postprandial glycemia (PPG). RESULTS: Globally, 229 women completed the study, 78 in C, 151 in M. Use of insulin was 16.7% in C, 30.4% in M (total groups), significantly more frequent in M than in C (59.7% vs 15.4%) when considering only women with AC > or =75th c. Mean metabolic data were similar in the 2 groups, but in M a tightly-optimized subgroup, resulting from the lowering of GT due to AC > or =75th, coexisted with a less-controlled one, whose higher GT was justified by AC<75th. Pregnancy outcome was better in M, with lower (p<0.05*) rate of LGA* (7.9% vs 17.9%), SGA (6.0% vs 9.0%) and Macrosomia* (3.3% vs 11.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show the value of a flexible US-based approach to the treatment of GDM. This model does not necessarily involve a generalized aggressive treatment, allowing to concentrate therapeutical efforts on a small subgroup of women showing indirect US evidence of fetal hyperinsulinization. Such a selective approach allowed to obtain a near-normalization of fetal growth, with clear advantages on global pregnancy outcome.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: In order to prevent abnormalities of fetal growth still characterizing pregnancies complicated by Gestational Diabetes (GDM), in the present study we evaluated a therapeutic strategy for GDM based on ultrasound (US) measurement of fetal insulin-sensitive tissues. METHODS: All GDM women diagnosed before 28th week immediately started diet and self-monitoring of blood glucose; after 2 weeks they were randomized to conventional (C) or modified (M) management. In C the glycemic target (GT) was fixed at 90 fasting/120 post-prandial mg/dl; in M GT varied, according to US measurement of the Abdominal Circumference (AC) centile performed every 2 weeks: 80/100 if AC > or =75th, 100/140 if AC<75th. Therapy was tailored to mean fasting (FG) and postprandial glycemia (PPG). RESULTS: Globally, 229 women completed the study, 78 in C, 151 in M. Use of insulin was 16.7% in C, 30.4% in M (total groups), significantly more frequent in M than in C (59.7% vs 15.4%) when considering only women with AC > or =75th c. Mean metabolic data were similar in the 2 groups, but in M a tightly-optimized subgroup, resulting from the lowering of GT due to AC > or =75th, coexisted with a less-controlled one, whose higher GT was justified by AC<75th. Pregnancy outcome was better in M, with lower (p<0.05*) rate of LGA* (7.9% vs 17.9%), SGA (6.0% vs 9.0%) and Macrosomia* (3.3% vs 11.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show the value of a flexible US-based approach to the treatment of GDM. This model does not necessarily involve a generalized aggressive treatment, allowing to concentrate therapeutical efforts on a small subgroup of women showing indirect US evidence of fetal hyperinsulinization. Such a selective approach allowed to obtain a near-normalization of fetal growth, with clear advantages on global pregnancy outcome.
Authors: Deborah J Wexler; Camille E Powe; Linda A Barbour; Thomas Buchanan; Donald R Coustan; Rosa Corcoy; Peter Damm; Fidelma Dunne; Denice S Feig; Assiamira Ferrara; Lorie M Harper; Mark B Landon; Sara J Meltzer; Boyd E Metzger; Hilary Roeder; Janet A Rowan; David A Sacks; David Simmons; Jason G Umans; Patrick M Catalano Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Ute M Schaefer-Graf; Luise Wendt; David A Sacks; Öemer Kilavuz; Bettina Gaber; Sabine Metzner; Klaus Vetter; Michael Abou-Dakn Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-09-23 Impact factor: 19.112