Literature DB >> 15222966

Responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: effect of body weight manipulation.

Terry W Belke1.   

Abstract

As body weight increases, the excitatory strength of a stimulus signaling an opportunity to run should weaken to a greater degree than that of a stimulus signaling an opportunity to eat. To test this hypothesis, six male albino Wistar rats were placed in running wheels and exposed to a fixed interval 30-s schedule that produced either a drop of 15% sucrose solution or the opportunity to run for 15s as reinforcing consequences for lever pressing. Each reinforcer type was signaled by a different stimulus. The effect of varying body weight on responding maintained by these two reinforcers was investigated by systematically increasing and decreasing post-session food amounts. The initial body weight was 335 g. Body weights were increased to approximately 445 g and subsequently returned to 335 g. As body weight increased, overall and local lever-pressing rates decreased while post-reinforcement pauses lengthened. Analysis of post-reinforcement pauses and local lever-pressing rates in terms of transitions between successive reinforcers revealed that local response rates in the presence of stimuli signaling upcoming wheel and sucrose reinforcers were similarly affected. However, pausing in the presence of the stimulus signaling a wheel-running reinforcer lengthened to a greater extent than did pausing in the presence of the stimulus signaling sucrose. This result suggests that as body weight approaches ad-lib levels, the likelihood of initiation of responding to obtain an opportunity to run approaches zero and the animal "rejects" the opportunity to run in a manner similar to the rejection of less preferred food items in studies of food selectivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15222966     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2003.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  5 in total

1.  Exclusive preference develops less readily on concurrent ratio schedules with wheel-running than with sucrose reinforcement.

Authors:  Terry W Belke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reinforcement value and substitutability of sucrose and wheel running: implications for activity anorexia.

Authors:  Terry W Belke; W David Pierce; Ian D Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reciprocal inhibitory effects of intravenous d-methamphetamine self-administration and wheel activity in rats.

Authors:  M L Miller; B D Vaillancourt; M J Wright; S M Aarde; S A Vandewater; K M Creehan; M A Taffe
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  A brief opportunity to run does not function as a reinforcer for mice selected for high daily wheel-running rates.

Authors:  Terry W Belke; Theodore Garland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Running and addiction: precipitated withdrawal in a rat model of activity-based anorexia.

Authors:  Robin B Kanarek; Kristen E D'Anci; Nicole Jurdak; Wendy Foulds Mathes
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.