Literature DB >> 15222715

Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy.

Paola Cozza1, Laura De Toffol, Stefania Colagrossi.   

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate cephalometrically the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue modifications induced by activator treatment in patients with Class II malocclusions caused by mandibular retrognathism. The subjects, all in the mixed dentition, were selected from a single centre and were divided into two groups: 40 patients treated with an incisor double capping activator (20 girls, 20 boys with a mean age of 10 years) and a control group of 30 subjects (15 girls, 15 boys with a mean age of 10 years). The dentoskeletal and aesthetic changes that occurred were compared on lateral cephalograms taken before treatment (T0) and after 18-24 months, when the activator was removed (T1). In the control group the radiographs were obtained before (T0) and after (T1) 21 months (standard deviation +/- 3 months). Activator treatment in these growing patients resulted in a correction of the Class II relationship (ANB -2.14 degrees), a restriction of maxillary growth (SNA -0.5 degrees), an advancement of the mandibular structures (SNB +1.64 degrees, FH--NPg +3.39 degrees; OLp-B +5.17 mm, OLp-Pg +5.14 mm, OLp-Go +2.44 mm), a correction of the overjet (-5.03 mm), an improvement in overbite (-1.17 mm) and uprighting of the maxillary incisors (1--FH -5.64 degrees). The activator appliance was effective in treating growing patients with mandibular deficiency: activator therapy corrected Class II malocclusions by a combination of skeletal and dental changes and improved the soft tissue facial profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15222715     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/26.3.293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  11 in total

1.  Effects of two different functional appliances on root development of posterior teeth: activator vs. bite-jumping appliance.

Authors:  Gero Kinzinger; Susanna Savvaidis; Norbert Gülden; Björn Ludwig; Michael Knösel; Jörg Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Comparison of Forsus FRD EZ and Andresen activator in the treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusions.

Authors:  Fundagül Bilgiç; Güvenç Başaran; Orhan Hamamci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Changes in soft-tissue profiles after treatment of class II/1 patients with bite-jumping appliances.

Authors:  Jörg Alexander Lisson; Kay Mokrys; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Bettina Glasl; Björn Ludwig
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Skeletal and Dental Effects of Twin-Block Appliances in Patients Treated With or Without Expansion.

Authors:  Muhammed Hilmi Buyukcavus; Burak Kale
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-09

5.  Does daily wear time of Twin Block reliably predict its efficiency of class II treatment?

Authors:  Michal Sarul; Marek Nahajowski; Grzegorz Gawin; Joanna Antoszewska-Smith
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.341

6.  3D Comparison of Mandibular Response to Functional Appliances: Balters Bionator versus Sander Bite Jumping.

Authors:  Francesca Gazzani; Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Kurt Faltin; Lorenzo Franchi; Paola Cozza; Renato Bigliazzi; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Roberta Lione
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  A Prospective Study Comparing Adolescent and Post-Adolescent Periods Regarding Effects of Activator Appliance in Patients with Class II Mandibular Retrognathia by Using 3dMDface Analysis and Cephalometry.

Authors:  Esra Yüksel Coşkun; Elçin Esenlik
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-06-26

8.  Facial esthetic outcome of functional followed by fixed orthodontic treatment of class II division 1 patients.

Authors:  Mary-Eleni Zouloumi; Kleopatra Tsiouli; Simeon Psomiadis; Olga-Elpis Kolokitha; Nikolaos Topouzelis; Nikolaos Gkantidis
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  Orthodontic Compliance Assessment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marek Nahajowski; Joanna Lis; Michał Sarul
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.607

10.  Development of novel artificial intelligence systems to predict facial morphology after orthognathic surgery and orthodontic treatment in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Chihiro Tanikawa; Takashi Yamashiro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.