BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A substantial body of evidence suggests that allogeneic blood transfusion increases the rate of recurrence of resected malignancies. The present study was conducted with the aim of understanding better the clinical characteristics of recurrent esophageal cancer and determining whether any survival advantage is conferred by transfusing autologous instead of allogeneic blood during the esophagectomy for the original malignancy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 123 patients who received blood transfusion while undergoing esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer between January 1991 and February 1998. We focused on those patients in whom the malignancy recurred. Of them, 23 patients received allogeneic blood and 18 received autologous blood. Compared were the clinico-pathological factors influencing prognosis as well as the disease-free survival periods and the period of survival after recurrence of the cancer. RESULTS: The clinico-pathological factors that influenced prognosis were similar in the two groups. There was also no significant difference in the rate at which the esophageal cancer recurred, or in survival time once it had recurred. On the other hand, disease-free survival prior to recurrence was significantly prolonged in the autologous blood transfusion group. CONCLUSION: Use of autologous instead of allogeneic blood prolongs disease-free survival of esophageal cancer patients. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A substantial body of evidence suggests that allogeneic blood transfusion increases the rate of recurrence of resected malignancies. The present study was conducted with the aim of understanding better the clinical characteristics of recurrent esophageal cancer and determining whether any survival advantage is conferred by transfusing autologous instead of allogeneic blood during the esophagectomy for the original malignancy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 123 patients who received blood transfusion while undergoing esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer between January 1991 and February 1998. We focused on those patients in whom the malignancy recurred. Of them, 23 patients received allogeneic blood and 18 received autologous blood. Compared were the clinico-pathological factors influencing prognosis as well as the disease-free survival periods and the period of survival after recurrence of the cancer. RESULTS: The clinico-pathological factors that influenced prognosis were similar in the two groups. There was also no significant difference in the rate at which the esophageal cancer recurred, or in survival time once it had recurred. On the other hand, disease-free survival prior to recurrence was significantly prolonged in the autologous blood transfusion group. CONCLUSION: Use of autologous instead of allogeneic blood prolongs disease-free survival of esophageal cancerpatients. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Matthias Reeh; Tarik Ghadban; Josephine Dedow; Eik Vettorazzi; Faik G Uzunoglu; Michael Nentwich; Stefan Kluge; Jakob R Izbicki; Yogesh K Vashist Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: M Gierth; A Aziz; H M Fritsche; M Burger; W Otto; F Zeman; M T Pawlik; E Hansen; M May; S Denzinger Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-02-08 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Frederike C Ling; Arnulf H Hoelscher; Daniel Vallböhmer; Daniel Schmidt; Susanne Picker; Birgit S Gathof; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Paul M Schneider Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2009-01-17 Impact factor: 3.452