K Whelan1, P A Judd, M A Taylor. 1. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, King's College London, UK. kevin.whelan@kcl.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a practical, valid and reliable chart to assist in the accurate visual characterization of fecal output in patients receiving enteral tube feeding (ETF). DESIGN: A chart incorporating verbal and pictorial descriptors of fecal output was developed. Validity and reliability were assessed by a questionnaire survey of health professionals and a clinical study of patients commencing ETF. Content validity was assessed from the results of the questionnaire, construct validity by contrasting groups analysis, concurrent validity by comparison of the chart with actual fecal weight and inter-rater reliability by independent characterization of the same fecal sample by two nurses. SETTING: St George's Hospital, London, UK. SUBJECTS: In all, 35 health professionals completed a questionnaire with respect to the chart. The chart was then used to monitor fecal output in 36 patients commencing ETF for a total of 171 patient-days, during which time nurses used the chart to characterize 269 fecal samples, of which 59 were subsequently weighed. RESULTS: The results of the questionnaire suggested good content validity. The chart demonstrated statistically significant differences in fecal frequency, fecal consistency, fecal score and incidence of diarrhea for contrasting patient groups expected to have different fecal output (P < 0.05). The inter-rater reliability was almost perfect for fecal consistency (95% agreement, kappa = 0.91) and substantial for fecal weight (83%, kappa = 0.75). In all, 83% of fecal samples were assigned to the correct weight category (kappa = 0.75). CONCLUSION: The chart has good content, construct and concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability, and is suitable for both research and clinical use. SPONSORSHIP: This research was jointly supported by King's College London and Nestlé, UK.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a practical, valid and reliable chart to assist in the accurate visual characterization of fecal output in patients receiving enteral tube feeding (ETF). DESIGN: A chart incorporating verbal and pictorial descriptors of fecal output was developed. Validity and reliability were assessed by a questionnaire survey of health professionals and a clinical study of patients commencing ETF. Content validity was assessed from the results of the questionnaire, construct validity by contrasting groups analysis, concurrent validity by comparison of the chart with actual fecal weight and inter-rater reliability by independent characterization of the same fecal sample by two nurses. SETTING: St George's Hospital, London, UK. SUBJECTS: In all, 35 health professionals completed a questionnaire with respect to the chart. The chart was then used to monitor fecal output in 36 patients commencing ETF for a total of 171 patient-days, during which time nurses used the chart to characterize 269 fecal samples, of which 59 were subsequently weighed. RESULTS: The results of the questionnaire suggested good content validity. The chart demonstrated statistically significant differences in fecal frequency, fecal consistency, fecal score and incidence of diarrhea for contrasting patient groups expected to have different fecal output (P < 0.05). The inter-rater reliability was almost perfect for fecal consistency (95% agreement, kappa = 0.91) and substantial for fecal weight (83%, kappa = 0.75). In all, 83% of fecal samples were assigned to the correct weight category (kappa = 0.75). CONCLUSION: The chart has good content, construct and concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability, and is suitable for both research and clinical use. SPONSORSHIP: This research was jointly supported by King's College London and Nestlé, UK.
Authors: Jeffrey H Burton; Matthew Johnson; Jolene Johnson; Daniel S Hsia; Frank L Greenway; Mark L Heiman Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2015-03-23
Authors: Julio Plaza-Diaz; Carolina Gomez-Llorente; Laura Campaña-Martin; Esther Matencio; Inmaculada Ortuño; Rosario Martínez-Silla; Carlos Gomez-Gallego; Maria Jesús Periago; Gaspar Ros; Empar Chenoll; Salvador Genovés; Beatriz Casinos; Angela Silva; Dolores Corella; Olga Portolés; Fernando Romero; Daniel Ramón; Antonio Perez de la Cruz; Angel Gil; Luis Fontana Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joanna C Dionne; Kristen Sullivan; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Alyson Takaoka; Erick Huaileigh Duan; Waleed Alhazzani; John W Devlin; Matthew Duprey; Paul Moayyedi; David Armstrong; Lehana Thabane; Jennifer L Y Tsang; Roman Jaeschke; Cindy Hamielec; Tim Karachi; Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba; John Muscedere; Mohammed Saeed Saad Alshahrani; Deborah J Cook Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: P Marquis; K E Lasch; L Delgado-Herrera; S Kothari; A Lembo; C Lademacher; G Spears; A Nishida; Waldman L Tesler; E Piault; K Rosa; B Zeiher Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 4.488