Literature DB >> 15220594

Untreated silicone breast implant rupture.

Lisbet R Hölmich1, Ilse M Vejborg, Carsten Conrad, Susanne Sletting, Mimi Høier-Madsen, Jon P Fryzek, Joseph K McLaughlin, Kim Kjøller, Allan Wiik, Søren Friis.   

Abstract

Implant rupture is a well-known complication of breast implant surgery that can pass unnoticed by both patient and physician. To date, no prospective study has addressed the possible health implications of silicone breast implant rupture. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether untreated ruptures are associated with changes over time in magnetic resonance imaging findings, serologic markers, or self-reported breast symptoms. A baseline magnetic resonance imaging examination was performed in 1999 on 271 women who were randomly chosen from a larger cohort of women having cosmetic breast implants for a median period of 12 years (range, 3 to 25 years). A follow-up magnetic resonance imaging examination was carried out in 2001, excluding women who underwent explantation in the period between the two magnetic resonance imaging examinations (n = 44). On the basis of these examinations, the authors identified 64 women who had at least one ruptured implant at the first magnetic resonance imaging examination and, for comparison, all women who had intact implants at both examinations (n = 98). Magnetic resonance images from the two examinations were compared and changes in rupture configuration were evaluated. Comparisons were also made for self-reported breast symptoms occurring during the study period and for changes in serum values of antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, and cardiolipin antibodies immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M. The majority of the women with implant rupture had no visible magnetic resonance imaging changes of their ruptured implants. For 11 implants (11 percent) in 10 women, the authors observed progression of silicone seepage, either as a conversion from intracapsular into extracapsular rupture (n = 7), as progression of extra-capsular silicone (n = 3), or as increasing herniation of the silicone within the fibrous capsule (n = 1); however, in most cases, these changes were minor. Some changes could be ascribed to trauma, but others seemed spontaneous. There was no increase in levels of autoantibodies during the study period in either study group. Women with untreated implant ruptures reported a significant increase in nonspecific breast changes (odds ratio, 2.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.8) compared with women without ruptures. On the basis of this first study of women with untreated silicone breast implant rupture, the authors conclude that implant rupture is a relatively harmless condition, which only rarely progresses and gives rise to notable symptoms. Even so, because of a small risk of silicone spread, the authors suggest that women with implant ruptures be followed clinically, if not operated on. Because implant ruptures often occur asymptomatically, any woman with silicone implants, regardless of rupture status, should be evaluated at regular intervals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15220594     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000128821.87939.b5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  13 in total

1.  Role of US in evaluating breast implant integrity.

Authors:  Michele Telegrafo; Marco Moschetta
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2015-06-23

2.  An adipoinductive role of inflammation in adipose tissue engineering: key factors in the early development of engineered soft tissues.

Authors:  Heidi E Lilja; Wayne A Morrison; Xiao-Lian Han; Jason Palmer; Caroline Taylor; Richard Tee; Andreas Möller; Erik W Thompson; Keren M Abberton
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 3.  Risk of rheumatic disease in breast implant users: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Sabrina Hoa; Kathleen Milord; Marie Hudson; Stephen C Nicolaidis; Josiane Bourré-Tessier
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-08

4.  A Surgeon's Empirical Perspectives on Use of High-resolution Ultrasound in Preoperatively Detecting a Rupture in the Context of Breast Implant Crisis in Korea.

Authors:  Bum Sik Bang; Seong Hoon Jung; Eun Kyoung Lee; Jung Youp Sung; Keun Yeong Song; Young Bum Yoo; Dong Wook Park; Jeong Eun Sohn; Jae Hong Kim
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Safety and Effectiveness of Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants in Primary Augmentation Patients.

Authors:  Daniel Maxwell; Megan Estes; Jennifer McMillen Walcott; John W Canady; Tina D Hunter; Larry Gache; Bernadette Wang-Ashraf; Diane Alexander
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.283

6.  Imaging of breast implants-a pictorial review.

Authors:  Sergi Juanpere; Elsa Perez; Oscar Huc; Naiara Motos; Josep Pont; Salvador Pedraza
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-08-07

7.  Soft, Brown Rupture: Clinical Signs and Symptoms Associated with Ruptured PIP Breast Implants.

Authors:  Yvette Godwin; Robert T Duncan; Christine Feig; Michelle Reintals; Sarah Hill
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-12-05

8.  Correlation between MRI results and intraoperative findings in patients with silicone breast implants.

Authors:  Nicole Lindenblatt; Karem El-Rabadi; Thomas H Helbich; Heinrich Czembirek; Maria Deutinger; Heike Benditte-Klepetko
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-07-30

9.  A retrospective analysis of ruptured breast implants.

Authors:  Woo Yeol Baek; Dae Hyun Lew; Dong Won Lee
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11-03

10.  Axillary silicone lymphadenopathy presenting with a lump and altered sensation in the breast: a case report.

Authors:  Simon T Adams; Julie Cox; G Sam Rao
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2009-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.