Literature DB >> 15220386

Calibration and error in placental molecular clocks: a conservative approach using the cetartiodactyl fossil record.

M van Tuinen1, E A Hadly.   

Abstract

The nature of the molecular and fossil record and their limitations must be ascertained in order to gain the most precise and accurate evolutionary timescale using genetic information. Yet the majority of such timescales are based on point estimates using fossils or the molecular clock. Here we document from the primary literature minimum and maximum fossil age estimates of the divergence of whales from artiodactyls, a commonly used anchor point for calibrating both mitogenomic and nucleogenomic placental timescales. We applied these reestimates to the most recently established placental timescale based on mitochondrial rRNA and several nuclear loci, and present an attempt to account for both genetic and fossil uncertainty. Our results indicate that disregard for fossil calibration error may inflate the power of the molecular clock when testing the time of ordinal diversification in context with the K-T boundary. However, the early history of placentals, including their superordinal diversification, remained in the Cretaceous despite a conservative approach. Our conclusions need corroboration across other frequently used fossil anchor points, but also with more genetic partitions on the linear relationship between molecular substitutions and geologic time. Copyright 2004 The American Genetic Association

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15220386     DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esh045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  5 in total

Review 1.  Darwin's dilemma: the realities of the Cambrian 'explosion'.

Authors:  Simon Conway Morris
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  A high-resolution physical map of equine homologs of HSA19 shows divergent evolution compared with other mammals.

Authors:  Candice Brinkmeyer-Langford; Terje Raudsepp; Eun-Joon Lee; Glenda Goh; Alejandro A Schäffer; Richa Agarwala; Michelle L Wagner; Teruaki Tozaki; Loren C Skow; James E Womack; James R Mickelson; Bhanu P Chowdhary
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Mammalian evolution may not be strictly bifurcating.

Authors:  Björn M Hallström; Axel Janke
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  A supermatrix analysis of genomic, morphological, and paleontological data from crown Cetacea.

Authors:  Jonathan H Geisler; Michael R McGowen; Guang Yang; John Gatesy
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Best practices for justifying fossil calibrations.

Authors:  James F Parham; Philip C J Donoghue; Christopher J Bell; Tyler D Calway; Jason J Head; Patricia A Holroyd; Jun G Inoue; Randall B Irmis; Walter G Joyce; Daniel T Ksepka; José S L Patané; Nathan D Smith; James E Tarver; Marcel van Tuinen; Ziheng Yang; Kenneth D Angielczyk; Jenny M Greenwood; Christy A Hipsley; Louis Jacobs; Peter J Makovicky; Johannes Müller; Krister T Smith; Jessica M Theodor; Rachel C M Warnock; Michael J Benton
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 15.683

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.