Literature DB >> 15220014

Results of a multicenter, randomized, open-label efficacy and safety study of two doses of tigecycline for complicated skin and skin-structure infections in hospitalized patients.

Russell G Postier1, Stephen L Green, Stanley R Klein, E J Ellis-Grosse, Evan Loh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tigecycline is a broad-spectrum glycylcycline antibiotic being investigated for the treatment of serious infections in hospitalized patients. Tigecycline has been shown to be efficacious against serious infections in animals, and preliminary studies in healthy adults have shown that tigecycline has an acceptable tolerability profile.
OBJECTIVE: This study compared the clinical and microbiological efficacy, pharmacokinetic properties, and tolerability of 2 doses of tigecycline in hospitalized patients with a complicated skin and skin-structure infection (cSSSI).
METHODS: This Phase II, randomized, open-label study was conducted between September 1999 and March 2001 at 14 investigative centers across the United States. Patients were randomized to receive tigecycline 25 or 50 mg IV q12h for 7 to 14 days. The primary efficacy end point was the clinically observed cure rate among clinically evaluable (CE) patients at the test-of-cure visit. Secondary end points were the clinical cure rate at the end of treatment and bacteriologic response in microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients. Also, in vitro tests of susceptibility to tigecycline were performed for selected pathogens known to cause skin infections, including methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium. Tolerability assessments also were conducted.
RESULTS: A total of 160 patients received > or =1 dose of tigecycline; 109 patients were CE, and 91 were ME. The majority of patients (74%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 49.0 (14.8) years. At the test-of-cure visit, the clinical cure rate in the 25-mg group was 67% (95% CI, 53.3%-79.3%) and in the 50-mg group was 74% (95% CI, 60.3%-85.0%). In the 25-mg group, 56% of the patients had eradication (95% CI, 40.0%-70.4%) of the pathogens compared with 69% (95% CI, 54.2%-82.3%) in the 50-mg group. Values for the minimum concentration of tigecycline that is inhibitory for 90% of all isolates ranged from 0.06 to 0.50 microg/mL for the selected pathogens. Both tigecycline doses were generally well tolerated. Nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, tigecycline appeared efficacious and showed a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of hospitalized patients with cSSSI. In patients who received 50-mg doses of tigecycline q12h, the clinical cure rates and microbial eradication rates were 74% and 70%, respectively, and were 67% and 56% in patients who received 25-mg doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15220014     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90070-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  21 in total

Review 1.  Tigecycline.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Monique P Curran
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Successful treatment of septic shock due to pan-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii using combined antimicrobial therapy including tigecycline.

Authors:  F S Taccone; H Rodriguez-Villalobos; D De Backer; V De Moor; J Deviere; J-L Vincent; F Jacobs
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Pharmacokinetics of tigecycline after single and multiple doses in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Gopal Muralidharan; Marlynne Micalizzi; John Speth; Donald Raible; Steven Troy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Diabetic foot infections: microbiological aspects, current and future antibiotic therapy focusing on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Andreas Ambrosch; Simone Haefner; Edward Jude; Ralf Lobmann
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Safety and efficacy of tigecycline in treatment of skin and skin structure infections: results of a double-blind phase 3 comparison study with vancomycin-aztreonam.

Authors:  Johannes Breedt; Jüri Teras; Janis Gardovskis; Frans Jacobus Maritz; Tiit Vaasna; Douglas Patrick Ross; Martine Gioud-Paquet; Nathalie Dartois; Evelyn J Ellis-Grosse; Evan Loh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Effects of age and sex on single-dose pharmacokinetics of tigecycline in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Gopal Muralidharan; Richard J Fruncillo; Marlynne Micalizzi; Donald G Raible; Steven M Troy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Pharmacokinetic profile of tigecycline in serum and skin blister fluid of healthy subjects after multiple intravenous administrations.

Authors:  Heather K Sun; Christine T Ong; Ambreen Umer; Dawn Harper; Steven Troy; Charles H Nightingale; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  National athletic trainers' association position statement: skin diseases.

Authors:  Steven M Zinder; Rodney S W Basler; Jack Foley; Chris Scarlata; David B Vasily
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 9.  Newer treatment options for skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Murugan Raghavan; Peter K Linden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Treatment of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Kyle J Popovich; Bala Hota; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.