Literature DB >> 15219664

Differences in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and lower subparaventricular zone of diurnal and nocturnal rodents.

M D Schwartz1, A A Nunez, L Smale.   

Abstract

Diurnal and nocturnal species are profoundly different in terms of the temporal organization of daily rhythms in physiology and behavior. The neural bases for these divergent patterns are at present unknown. Here we examine functional differences in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and one of its primary targets in a diurnal rodent, the unstriped Nile grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus) and in a nocturnal one, the laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus). Grass rats and laboratory rats were housed in a 12:12 light:dark cycle, and killed at six time points. cFos-immunoreactive rhythms in the SCN of grass rats and laboratory rats were similar to those reported previously, with peaks early in the light phase and troughs in the dark phase. However, cFos-immunoreactivity in the lower subparaventricular zone (LSPV) of grass rats rose sharply 5 h into the dark phase, and remained high through the first hour after light onset, whereas in laboratory rats it peaked 1 h after light onset and was low at all other sampling times. Daily cFos rhythms in both the SCN and the LSPV persisted in grass rats, but not in laboratory rats, after extended periods in constant darkness. In grass rats, the endogenous cFos rhythm in the LSPV, but not the SCN, was present both in calbindin-positive and in calbindin-negative cells. Cells that expressed cFos at night in the region of the LSPV in grass rats were clearly outside of the boundaries of the SCN as delineated by Nissl stain and immunoreactivity for vasopressin and vasoactive intestinal peptide. The LSPV of the grass rat, a region that receives substantial input from the SCN, displays a daily rhythm in cFos expression that differs from that of laboratory rats with respect to its rising phase, the duration of the peak and its dependence on a light/dark cycle. These characteristics may reflect the existence of mechanisms in the LSPV that enable it to modulate efferent SCN signals differently in diurnal and nocturnal species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15219664     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.04.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  29 in total

1.  c-Fos expression in the brains of behaviorally "split" hamsters in constant light: calling attention to a dorsolateral region of the suprachiasmatic nucleus and the medial division of the lateral habenula.

Authors:  Mahboubeh Tavakoli-Nezhad; William J Schwartz
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.182

2.  Projections of the suprachiasmatic nucleus and ventral subparaventricular zone in the Nile grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus).

Authors:  Michael D Schwartz; Henryk F Urbanski; Antonio A Nunez; Laura Smale
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  The Drosophila circadian pacemaker circuit: Pas De Deux or Tarantella?

Authors:  Vasu Sheeba; Maki Kaneko; Vijay Kumar Sharma; Todd C Holmes
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 4.  Circadian regulation of membrane physiology in neural oscillators throughout the brain.

Authors:  Jodi R Paul; Jennifer A Davis; Lacy K Goode; Bryan K Becker; Allison Fusilier; Aidan Meador-Woodruff; Karen L Gamble
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 5.  Behavioral neuroendocrinology in nontraditional species of mammals: things the 'knockout' mouse CAN'T tell us.

Authors:  Laura Smale; Paul D Heideman; Jeffrey A French
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  Functional and anatomical variations in retinorecipient brain areas in Arvicanthis niloticus and Rattus norvegicus: implications for the circadian and masking systems.

Authors:  Dorela D Shuboni-Mulligan; Breyanna L Cavanaugh; Anne Tonson; Erik M Shapiro; Andrew J Gall
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Distinct retinohypothalamic innervation patterns predict the developmental emergence of species-typical circadian phase preference in nocturnal Norway rats and diurnal nile grass rats.

Authors:  William D Todd; Andrew J Gall; Joshua A Weiner; Mark S Blumberg
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Phase preference for the display of activity is associated with the phase of extra-suprachiasmatic nucleus oscillators within and between species.

Authors:  C Ramanathan; A Stowie; L Smale; A A Nunez
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Daily rhythms in PER1 within and beyond the suprachiasmatic nucleus of female grass rats (Arvicanthis niloticus).

Authors:  C Ramanathan; A A Nunez; L Smale
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Intergeniculate leaflet lesions result in differential activation of brain regions following the presentation of photic stimuli in Nile grass rats.

Authors:  Andrew J Gall; Lily Yan; Laura Smale; Antonio A Nunez
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.