Literature DB >> 15219265

Profiles of measured and perceived bronchodilation. A placebo-controlled cross-over trial comparing formoterol and salmeterol in moderate persistent asthma.

T R J Schermer1, W J Hoff, A P M Greefhorst, J P H M Creemers, A P Sips, J Westbroek, C L A van Herwaarden.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Long-acting beta(2)-agonists have acquired an indispensable position in the management of bronchial symptoms in patients with asthma. The objective of this study was to compare onset-of-action and clinical effectiveness of formoterol and salmeterol during 2 weeks of treatment. We also investigated the association between bronchodilator effects and perceived relieve of dyspnoea.
METHODS: A multi-centre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial was performed in 35 subjects with moderate persistent asthma. Treatment periods existed of 2 weeks formoterol (12 microg bid), salmeterol (50 microg bid) and placebo, all administered by pressurized metered dose inhaler. FEV(1) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were repeatedly measured until 180 min post-bronchodilation (post-BD), before as well as after each treatment period. Onset-of-action was defined as a >/=15% increase in FEV(1). Subjects kept diaries of morning and evening PEFR values and use of rescue bronchodilator.
RESULTS: Formoterol and salmeterol both caused a significant increase in FEV(1) (0.45L [95% CI 0.01, 0.80] and 0.27L [95% CI 0.08, 0.62] respectively). At 3' post-BD, three times as many subjects demonstrated onset-of-action on formoterol compared to salmeterol (36% versus 13%, P = 0.063), at 6' post-BD 42% versus 27% (P = 0.063). VAS scores were similar for formoterol and salmeterol at pre-treatment assessment, but tended to be higher for formoterol after 2weeks treatment. No differences between formoterol and salmeterol were observed for PEFR values or use of rescue medication. 50% of the subjects preferred formoterol, 29% salmeterol (P < 0.001). Significant associations between FEV(1) and VAS ratings existed only at 10', 15' and 30' post-BD, not before or after these time points.
CONCLUSION: The earlier described faster onset-of-action of formoterol as compared to a equipotent dosage of salmeterol was confirmed in this study. Perception of decreasing airflow obstruction may be delayed after acute bronchodilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15219265     DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2004.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pulm Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 1094-5539            Impact factor:   3.410


  2 in total

1.  A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the role of formoterol in the management of acute asthma.

Authors:  Katayoon Najafizadeh; Hamid Sohrab Pour; Mojtaba Ghadyanee; Masoud Shiehmorteza; Masoud Jamali; Sayeed Majdzadeh
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of formoterol versus salmeterol in the treatment of patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ashraf Velayati; Seyed Alireza Hosseini; Ali Akbari Sari; Farideh Mohtasham; Mostafa Ghanei; Mohsen Yaghoubi; Reza Majdzadeh
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.852

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.