Literature DB >> 15218934

Arrays for chronic functional microstimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord.

Douglas McCreery1, Victor Pikov, Albert Lossinsky, Leo Bullara, William Agnew.   

Abstract

Our objective is to develop neural prostheses based on an array of microelectrodes implanted into the sacral spinal cord, that will allow persons with spinal cord injuries to regain control of their bladder and bowels. For our chronic cat model, we have developed two microelectrode arrays, one type containing nine discrete activated iridium microelectrodes and the second utilizing silicon substrate probes with multiple electrode sites on each probe. Both types can elicit an increase in the pressure within the urinary bladder of more than 40-mm Hg and/or relaxation of the urethral sphincter. A stimulus of 100 microA and 400 micros/ph at 20 Hz (charge-balanced pulses) was required to induce a large increase in bladder pressure or relaxation of the urethral sphincter. We found that 24 h of continuous stimulation with these parameters induced tissue injury (disrupted neuropil, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and loss of neurons close to the tip sites). However, a neural prosthesis that is intended to restore bladder control after spinal cord injury would not operate continuously. Thus, when this stimulus was applied for 24 h, at a 10% duty cycle (1 min of stimulation, then 9 min without stimulation) only minimal histologic changes were observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15218934     DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.827223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  21 in total

1.  The effects of intraspinal microstimulation on spinal cord tissue in the rat.

Authors:  Jeremy A Bamford; Kathryn G Todd; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Finite element analysis of a floating microstimulator.

Authors:  Mesut Sahin; Syed S Ur-Rahman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 3.  Advanced neurotechnologies for chronic neural interfaces: new horizons and clinical opportunities.

Authors:  Daryl R Kipke; William Shain; György Buzsáki; E Fetz; Jaimie M Henderson; Jamille F Hetke; Gerwin Schalk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Wireless microstimulators for neural prosthetics.

Authors:  Mesut Sahin; Victor Pikov
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2011

Review 5.  Intraspinal microstimulation for the recovery of function following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jeremy A Bamford; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 6.  Neuroprosthetic technology for individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jennifer L Collinger; Stephen Foldes; Tim M Bruns; Brian Wodlinger; Robert Gaunt; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Feasibility of Neural Stimulation With Floating-Light-Activated Microelectrical Stimulators.

Authors:  Ammar Abdo; Mesut Sahin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.833

8.  Bidirectional telemetry controller for neuroprosthetic devices.

Authors:  Vishnu Sharma; Douglas B McCreery; Martin Han; Victor Pikov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 9.  Spinal cord injury: present and future therapeutic devices and prostheses.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

10.  Development of surrogate spinal cords for the evaluation of electrode arrays used in intraspinal implants.

Authors:  Cheng Cheng; Jonn Kmech; Vivian K Mushahwar; Anastasia L Elias
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.