Literature DB >> 15218693

Analysis of the microvasculature and tissue type ratios in normal vs. benign and malignant breast tissue.

Wendy A Wells1, Charles P Daghlian, Tor D Tosteson, Margaret R Grove, Steven P Poplack, Sandra Knowlton-Soho, Keith D Paulsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the microvasculature and tissue type ratios in normal vs. benign and malignant breast tissue to establish a baseline for expected values against which future imaging studies can be benchmarked. STUDY
DESIGN: Using computer-assisted techniques on immunostained breast tissue (normal [n = 28], fibrocystic [n = 37], fibroadenomas [n = 19], invasive carcinomas [n = 19]), values were obtained for microvessel density (MVD), mean vessel area (MVA), vessel orientation (shape) and epithelial:stromal ratio (E:S). Measurement reproducibility and the effects of fibroadenoma stromal hyalinization and fibrocystic disease severity were also tested.
RESULTS: Value ranges for the 4 diagnostic groups were significantly different (P < .001). For invasive breast carcinomas, E:S and MVD were significantly higher (P < .001) but MVA was smaller as compared to that in fibroadenomas. Peripherally vs. centrally there was no significant difference in MVD, MVA or vessel shape in the neoplasms. Decreases in E:S and MVD correlated with fibroadenoma stromal hyalinization. Increases in E:S and MVA correlated with more severe fibrocystic disease. Correlation coefficients for measurement reproducibility were high across the diagnostic categories.
CONCLUSION: This study established a specific, reproducible, computer-assisted technique and baseline of expected values for morphologic criteria in normal, benign and malignant breast tissue that may be used in the future to correlate new breast imaging responses with these underlying biologic properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15218693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol Histol        ISSN: 0884-6812            Impact factor:   0.302


  8 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of a Near-Infrared Breast Imaging system as adjunct to mammography versus X-ray mammography alone.

Authors:  F Collettini; J C Martin; F Diekmann; E Fallenberg; F Engelken; S Ponder; T J Kroencke; B Hamm; A Poellinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Tumor angiogenesis change estimated by using diffuse optical spectroscopic tomography: demonstrated correlation in women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer?

Authors:  Marius G Pakalniskis; Wendy A Wells; Mary C Schwab; Heather M Froehlich; Shudong Jiang; Zhongze Li; Tor D Tosteson; Steven P Poplack; Peter A Kaufman; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Phase contrast microscopy analysis of breast tissue: differences in benign vs. malignant epithelium and stroma.

Authors:  Wendy A Wells; Xin Wang; Charles P Daghlian; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol Histol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 0.302

4.  A mixture theory model of fluid and solute transport in the microvasculature of normal and malignant tissues. II: Factor sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validation.

Authors:  M M Schuff; J P Gore; E A Nauman
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Assessing the spatial extent of breast tumor intrinsic optical contrast using ultrasound and diffuse optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  Ang Li; Jing Liu; Wendy Tanamai; Richard Kwong; Albert E Cerussi; Bruce J Tromberg
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Real-time electrical impedance variations in women with and without breast cancer.

Authors:  Ryan J Halter; Alex Hartov; Steven P Poplack; Roberta diFlorio-Alexander; Wendy A Wells; Kari M Rosenkranz; Richard J Barth; Peter A Kaufman; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Mixture theory modeling for characterizing solute transport in breast tumor tissues.

Authors:  Sreyashi Chakraborty; Alican Ozkan; Marissa Nichole Rylander; Wendy A Woodward; Pavlos Vlachos
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.355

8.  In situ validation of VEGFR-2 and α v ß 3 integrin as targets for breast lesion characterization.

Authors:  Josef Ehling; Matthias Misiewicz; Saskia von Stillfried; Diana Möckel; Jessica Bzyl; Sibylle Pochon; Wiltrud Lederle; Ruth Knuechel; Twan Lammers; Moritz Palmowski; Fabian Kiessling
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 9.596

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.