Literature DB >> 15218565

Effects on bone formation in ovariectomized rats after implantation of tooth ash and plaster of Paris mixture.

So-Young Kim1, Su-Gwan Kim, Sung-Chul Lim, Chun-Sik Bae.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our goal was to report on tooth ash and plaster of Paris mixture in bone defects in an ovariectomized rat osteoporosis model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty rats were randomly assigned to 4 groups and each group was further divided into 3 subgroups: 4, 8, and 16 weeks after implantation. The defect was filled with different grafting conditions as follows: group 1, ovariectomy and nongraft group; group 2, ovariectomy and tooth ash-plaster graft group; group 3, nonovariectomy and nongraft group; and group 4, nonovariectomy and tooth ash-plaster graft group. Histologic sections and histomorphometric analysis of defects were obtained 4, 8, and 16 weeks after surgery.
RESULTS: For the 4-week ovariectomy group, there was significantly greater bone formation in tooth ash-plaster group compared with the nongraft group. In the nonovariectomy group, the tooth ash-plaster group also showed better bone formation than the nongraft group. However, there was no statistical significance. In both the ovariectomy and nonovariectomy groups, a significant increase in bone formation was observed according to the elapse of time. The nonovariectomy group showed increased new bone formation compared with the ovariectomy group, with the tooth ash-plaster group showing statistical significance in each subgroup (P =.048).
CONCLUSIONS: Ovariectomy acts as a negative factor in new bone formation. For a critical size bony defect, the tooth ash-plaster treatment of the osseous defect produces more stable, effective, and rapid new bone formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15218565     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Reference Strategy for the Selection of Treatment Materials for Maxillofacial Bone Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shuxin Zhang; Xinyi Zhang; Yanli Li; Xuran Mao; Rui Liu; Yanxin Qi; Eui-Seok Lee; Heng Bo Jiang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.451

Review 2.  Comparison of Autogenous Tooth Materials and Other Bone Grafts.

Authors:  Shuxin Zhang; Xuehan Li; Yanxin Qi; Xiaoqian Ma; Shuzhan Qiao; HongXin Cai; Bing Cheng Zhao; Heng Bo Jiang; Eui-Seok Lee
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.169

3.  The Use of Tooth Particles as a Biomaterial in Post-Extraction Sockets. Experimental Study in Dogs.

Authors:  José Luis Calvo-Guirado; José Eduardo Maté-Sánchez de Val; María Luisa Ramos-Oltra; Carlos Pérez-Albacete Martínez; María Piedad Ramírez-Fernández; Manuel Maiquez-Gosálvez; Sergio A Gehrke; Manuel Fernández-Domínguez; Georgios E Romanos; Rafael Arcesio Delgado-Ruiz
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-06

4.  Cranial bone regeneration according to different particle sizes and densities of demineralized dentin matrix in the rabbit model.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Nam; Moon-Young Kim; Se-Jin Han
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-07-05

5.  Autologous Tooth Dentin Graft: A Retrospective Study in Humans.

Authors:  José Manuel Cervera-Maillo; David Morales-Schwarz; Hilde Morales-Melendez; Lanka Mahesh; José Luis Calvo-Guirado
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.