MOTIVATION: Application of mass spectrometry in proteomics is a breakthrough in high-throughput analyses. Early applications have focused on protein expression profiles to differentiate among various types of tissue samples (e.g. normal versus tumor). Here our goal is to use mass spectra to differentiate bacterial species using whole-organism samples. The raw spectra are similar to spectra of tissue samples, raising some of the same statistical issues (e.g. non-uniform baselines and higher noise associated with higher baseline), but are substantially noisier. As a result, new preprocessing procedures are required before these spectra can be used for statistical classification. RESULTS: In this study, we introduce novel preprocessing steps that can be used with any mass spectra. These comprise a standardization step and a denoising step. The noise level for each spectrum is determined using only data from that spectrum. Only spectral features that exceed a threshold defined by the noise level are subsequently used for classification. Using this approach, we trained the Random Forest program to classify 240 mass spectra into four bacterial types. The method resulted in zero prediction errors in the training samples and in two test datasets having 240 and 300 spectra, respectively.
MOTIVATION: Application of mass spectrometry in proteomics is a breakthrough in high-throughput analyses. Early applications have focused on protein expression profiles to differentiate among various types of tissue samples (e.g. normal versus tumor). Here our goal is to use mass spectra to differentiate bacterial species using whole-organism samples. The raw spectra are similar to spectra of tissue samples, raising some of the same statistical issues (e.g. non-uniform baselines and higher noise associated with higher baseline), but are substantially noisier. As a result, new preprocessing procedures are required before these spectra can be used for statistical classification. RESULTS: In this study, we introduce novel preprocessing steps that can be used with any mass spectra. These comprise a standardization step and a denoising step. The noise level for each spectrum is determined using only data from that spectrum. Only spectral features that exceed a threshold defined by the noise level are subsequently used for classification. Using this approach, we trained the Random Forest program to classify 240 mass spectra into four bacterial types. The method resulted in zero prediction errors in the training samples and in two test datasets having 240 and 300 spectra, respectively.
Authors: Xiuxia Du; Saiful M Chowdhury; Nathan P Manes; Si Wu; M Uljana Mayer; Joshua N Adkins; Gordon A Anderson; Richard D Smith Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Hercules Moura; Fernando Izquierdo; Adrian R Woolfitt; Glauber Wagner; Tatiana Pinto; Carmen del Aguila; John R Barr Journal: J Eukaryot Microbiol Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 3.346
Authors: Yulanda M Williamson; Hercules Moura; Adrian R Woolfitt; James L Pirkle; John R Barr; Maria Da Gloria Carvalho; Edwin P Ades; George M Carlone; Jacquelyn S Sampson Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2008-08-15 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Susmita Datta; Delano Turner; Reetu Singh; L Bruno Ruest; William M Pierce; Thomas B Knudsen Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2008-04
Authors: Dante Mantini; Francesca Petrucci; Damiana Pieragostino; Piero Del Boccio; Marta Di Nicola; Carmine Di Ilio; Giorgio Federici; Paolo Sacchetta; Silvia Comani; Andrea Urbani Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2007-03-26 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Hercules Moura; Adrian R Woolfitt; Maria G Carvalho; Antonis Pavlopoulos; Lucia M Teixeira; Glen A Satten; John R Barr Journal: FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol Date: 2008-06-05