Literature DB >> 15217637

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: does the pump influence outcome?

Andrew J Berson1, J Michael Smith, Scott E Woods, Kimberly A Hasselfeld, Loren F Hiratzka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study assessed hospitalization outcome differences for patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting compared with patients having coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a nested case-control study from an 8-year, hospitalization cohort (n = 7,905) in which the data were collected prospectively. Inclusion criteria included a coronary artery bypass graft only and age greater than 18 years. Cases were patients undergoing OPCAB (n = 360) and controls were patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 1,080). Cases were matched to controls 1:3 on five variables: age (+/- 3 years), gender, diabetes, New York Heart Association Functional Classification, and surgical year (+/- 3 years). The 13 outcomes of interest were mortality, length of hospitalization, ICU length of stay, return to ICU, ventilator time, intraoperative complications, pulmonary complications, neurologic complications, renal complications, gastrointestinal complications, sternal wound infections, highest postoperative creatine kinase level, and units of blood products given during the procedure. Using logistic regression we controlled for eight confounding variables.
RESULTS: Patients undergoing OPCAB had a significantly shorter length of hospitalization (relative risk [RR] = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99%), fewer pulmonary complications (RR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.88%), fewer intraoperative complications (RR = 0.04; 95% CI, 0.0048-0.31%) fewer blood product units given (RR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14-0.42%) and lower postoperative creatine kinase (RR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99%). There were no considerable differences for the remaining nine outcomes, including mortality and neurologic complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing OPCAB had a considerably shorter length of hospitalization, had fewer pulmonary and intraoperative complications, and received a lower volume of blood products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15217637     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  5 in total

Review 1.  Gastrointestinal complications and cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Sara J Allen
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2014-06

2.  Sex differences in resource use after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a propensity score-matched cohort.

Authors:  Manjula Maganti; Vivek Rao; Robert J Cusimano
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Mechanisms of pulmonary dysfunction after on-pump and off-pump cardiac surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  A B Johan Groeneveld; Evert K Jansen; Joanne Verheij
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 4.  Pulmonary Protection Strategies in Cardiac Surgery: Are We Making Any Progress?

Authors:  Emad Al Jaaly; Mustafa Zakkar; Francesca Fiorentino; Gianni D Angelini
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 6.543

5.  Outcome of coronary endarterectomy with coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease in Bangladesh: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Redoy Ranjan; Dipannita Adhikary; Sabita Mandal; Anjali Seedher; Asit Baran Adhikary
Journal:  JRSM Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2017-09-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.