Literature DB >> 15217413

Cross-species comparison of gene expression between human and porcine tissue, using single microarray platform--preliminary results.

Gaurang Shah1, Maria Azizian, David Bruch, Rajil Mehta, Dilip Kittur.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Xenotransplantation is a potential solution for inadequate supply of donor organs. Pigs are considered the ideal donor for kidney transplantation to human recipients, therefore it is important to understand the gene regulation in the porcine organs. Oligonucleotide array technology has been utilized largely for human, mouse and rat gene expression studies only. Its use with porcine genes has not been reported. We investigated the possibility of studying gene regulation in porcine kidney with a human GeneChip microarray platform.
METHODS: To assess the feasibility of using a single microarrray platform for comparison of expressing data across different species (human and pig), we compared the gene expression profiles of human brain, human kidney and pig kidney using the Affymetrix U-133 A human GeneChip, which contains probes for 22,283 genes. Kidney biopsies from pigs and humans, with normal histology, were used to obtain RNA for porcine and human samples, while a commercially available adult whole cortex total RNA sample (Clontech) was used for the human sample. We assessed the intensity ratio for housekeeping and tissue specific genes. To examine the potential for non-specific binding to create false positive errors in our data, we compared the expression profiles in our experiments to a number of public databases.
RESULTS: There were approximately the same number of genes expressed at higher levels in the pig kidney as in the human kidney and human brain. The major differences in gene expression were found for genes with tissue specific patterns of expression. Eighty genes were increased in human brain vs. human and pig kidney samples. Two hundred and eighty genes were increased in human and pig kidney vs. human brain samples. Of the top 25 genes increased in pig kidney compared with human brain, we were able to cross-reference 18 genes to the Unigene and SAGE public databases. We confirmed the expected higher levels of expression in the kidney in 18 genes. Of the top 25 genes increased in human brain vs. pig kidney, we were able to cross-reference 20 genes to the Unigene and SAGE databases and confirm the expected higher expression levels in brain in 17 genes with three inconclusive genes.
CONCLUSION: This low level of false positive findings, at this preliminary stage, supports the concept of using human GeneChip microarray platform to compare gene expression profiles between pig and human tissues in the absence of a porcine microarray platform. Our study opens a new avenue into the analysis of porcine genes relevant to xenotransplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15217413     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00223.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  13 in total

1.  Changes in brain gene expression during migration in the white-crowned sparrow.

Authors:  Stephany Jones; Martha Pfister-Genskow; Chiara Cirelli; Ruth M Benca
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Cross-species hybridization of woodchuck hepatitis virus-induced hepatocellular carcinoma using human oligonucleotide microarrays.

Authors:  Paul W Anderson; Bud C Tennant; Zhenghong Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Gene expression profiles in a rabbit model of systemic lupus erythematosus autoantibody production.

Authors:  Geeta Rai; Satyajit Ray; Jacqueline Milton; Jun Yang; Ping Ren; Richard Lempicki; Rose G Mage
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 4.  Contribution of large pig for renal ischemia-reperfusion and transplantation studies: the preclinical model.

Authors:  S Giraud; F Favreau; N Chatauret; R Thuillier; S Maiga; T Hauet
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-03-03

5.  A new method to remove hybridization bias for interspecies comparison of global gene expression profiles uncovers an association between mRNA sequence divergence and differential gene expression in Xenopus.

Authors:  Maureen A Sartor; Aaron M Zorn; Jennifer A Schwanekamp; Danielle Halbleib; Saikumar Karyala; Michael L Howell; Gary E Dean; Mario Medvedovic; Craig R Tomlinson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Cross-species hybridizations on a multi-species cDNA microarray to identify evolutionarily conserved genes expressed in oocytes.

Authors:  Maud Vallée; Claude Robert; Steve Méthot; Marie-France Palin; Marc-André Sirard
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Application of functional genomics to the chimeric mouse model of HCV infection: optimization of microarray protocols and genomics analysis.

Authors:  Kathie-Anne Walters; Michael A Joyce; Jill C Thompson; Sean Proll; James Wallace; Maria W Smith; Jeff Furlong; D Lorne Tyrrell; Michael G Katze
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 4.099

8.  Detection of transcriptional difference of porcine imprinted genes using different microarray platforms.

Authors:  Shengdar Tsai; Bashir Mir; Amy C Martin; Jose L Estrada; Steve R Bischoff; Wen-ping Hsieh; Joseph P Cassady; Bradley A Freking; Dan J Nonneman; Gary A Rohrer; Jorge A Piedrahita
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Global transcriptional response of pig brain and lung to natural infection by Pseudorabies virus.

Authors:  J F Yuan; S J Zhang; O Jafer; R A Furlong; O E Chausiaux; C A Sargent; G H Zhang; N A Affara
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Transcriptome analysis of spermatogenically regressed, recrudescent and active phase testis of seasonally breeding wall lizards Hemidactylus flaviviridis.

Authors:  Mukesh Gautam; Amitabh Mathur; Meraj Alam Khan; Subeer S Majumdar; Umesh Rai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.