Literature DB >> 1521702

Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents.

D M Wolf1, J M Powers, K L O'Keefe.   

Abstract

In vitro tensile bond strengths of composite to porcelain were evaluated using three pretreatments (HF etching, sandblasting, diamond abrasion) of the porcelain, four bonding agents (Clearfil Porcelain Bond, Porcelain Liner M, Porcelain Liner M with Super-Bond C&B, and Scotchprime) and two storage conditions (24 h and thermocycling). The overall coefficient of variation was 27%. Significant differences among bond strengths were observed, with storage condition being the most important factor, followed by bonding agent and then pretreatment. Thermocycling decreased the bond strength of all samples, but samples treated with Scotchprime were affected least. For 24 h storage, Clearfil Porcelain Bond and Scotchprime had bond strengths above 23 MN/m2 to sandblasted porcelain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1521702     DOI: 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90074-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  15 in total

1.  The effect of different surface treatments on roughness and bond strength in low fusing ceramics.

Authors:  Haluk Baris Kara; A Nilgun Ozturk; Filiz Aykent; Ozlem Koc; Bora Ozturk
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Effect of different surface treatments on roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic.

Authors:  Haluk Baris Kara; Erhan Dilber; Ozlem Koc; A Nilgun Ozturk; Mehmet Bulbul
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Evaluation of the effect of surface preparation using phosphoric acid and luting cement on the flexural strength of porcelain laminate veneering material.

Authors:  N Rivankar; R K Dhiman; M Viswambaran
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-10-23

4.  Evaluation of the effect of four surface conditioning methods on the shear bond strength of metal bracket to porcelain surface.

Authors:  Hooman Zarif Najafi; Morteza Oshagh; Sepideh Torkan; Bahareh Yousefipour; Raha Salehi
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Effect of four different surface treatments on shear bond strength of three porcelain repair systems: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Ritesh Gourav; Padma Ariga; Ashish R Jain; Jacob Mathew Philip
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-05

6.  Evaluation of shear bond strengths of gingiva-colored composite resin to porcelain, metal and zirconia substrates.

Authors:  Hong-Seok An; Ji-Man Park; Eun-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Detection of hydrofluoric acid by a SiO2 sol-gel coating fiber-optic probe based on reflection-based localized surface plasmon resonance.

Authors:  I-Cherng Chen; Shiu-Shiung Lin; Tsao-Jen Lin; Je-Kang Du
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive luting cements to ceramics.

Authors:  Tomoko Abo; Shigeru Uno; Masahiro Yoshiyama; Toshimoto Yamada; Nobuhiro Hanada
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-04-23

9.  Shear bond strength between alumina substrate and prosthodontic resin composites with various adhesive resin systems.

Authors:  Yousef A AlJehani; Jagan K Baskaradoss; Amrita Geevarghese; Marey A AlShehry; Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Shear bond strength of resin cement to an acid etched and a laser irradiated ceramic surface.

Authors:  Pinar Kursoglu; Pelin Fatma Karagoz Motro; Haktan Yurdaguven
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.