Literature DB >> 1521652

Prediction of in vitro fertilization outcome by sperm penetration assay with TEST-yolk buffer preincubation.

Y Soffer1, A Golan, A Herman, M Pansky, E Caspi, R Ron-El.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sperm penetration assay (SPA) value as a screening tool before in vitro fertilization (IVF).
DESIGN: Follow-up study comparing sperm variables and IVF outcome.
SETTING: Infertile couples in an academic research environment. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-one infertile couples scheduled for IVF.
INTERVENTIONS: Sperm penetrating assay with cold Tes-TRIS (TEST) Yolk buffer semen preincubation and IVF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percent of egg penetration recoded into poor and good category (0% to 20%, 21% to 100%) and compared with fertilization, embryo transfer, and pregnancy rate (PR) in IVF, as well as sperm count motility and morphology.
RESULTS: Sperm penetrating assay predicted fertilization with a high negative (74%) and positive (82%) predictive rate and good specificity value (0.96). One of 31 patients in the poor SPA category (3%) fertilized less than 50% of eggs; no pregnancy occurred. In the good SPA category, 87 of 210 patients (41%) fertilized greater than or equal to 50% of eggs with 34.3% PR. Sperm penetrating assay correlated better with fertilization rate than did sperm count and motility but not morphology.
CONCLUSIONS: Sperm penetrating assay is a useful screening assay before IVF together with sperm morphology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1521652     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55263-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Is intracytoplasmic sperm injection necessary for couples undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with normal semen analyses but failing hamster egg penetration assays?

Authors:  E S Surrey; G S Lee; M W Surrey; D Hill
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The sperm penetration assay for the assessment of fertilization capacity.

Authors:  Kathleen Hwang; Dolores J Lamb
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

3.  Hyaluronan binding assay (HBA) vs. sperm penetration assay (SPA): Can HBA replace the SPA test in male partner screening before in vitro fertilization?

Authors:  Jelena Lazarevic; Maria Wikarczuk; Stephen G Somkuti; Larry I Barmat; Jay S Schinfeld; Scott E Smith
Journal:  J Exp Clin Assist Reprod       Date:  2010-02-10

4.  Inter and intra-individual variability of sperm morphology after selection with three different techniques: layering, swimup from pellet and percoll.

Authors:  D Canale; P M Giorgi; M Gasperini; E Pucci; D Barletta; M Gasperi; E Martino
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 5.  Hemizona assay and sperm penetration assay in the prediction of IVF outcome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paraskevi Vogiatzi; Charalampos Chrelias; David J Cahill; Maria Creatsa; Nikos Vrachnis; Zoe Iliodromiti; Demetrios Kassanos; Charalampos Siristatidis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  The hamster egg penetration test may decrease intracytoplasmic sperm injection utilization while maintaining high conventional fertilization rates.

Authors:  Yetunde Ibrahim; Brett Einerson; Douglas T Carrell; Benjamin R Emery; Erica Johnstone
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.