Literature DB >> 15215795

Electrocardiographic poor R-wave progression: analysis of multiple criteria reveals little usefulness.

Apoor S Gami1, Thomas A Holly, James E Rosenthal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poor or reverse R-wave progression (PRWP) is a common statement on electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretations, but its value in diagnosing anterior myocardial infarction (MI) is disputed. We assessed the accuracy of PRWP criteria in diagnosing anterior MI.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (1960-1998) and found 3 criteria for PRWP. We included a modified version of the Marquette Muse system's criteria and multiple novel criteria. We interpreted resting ECGs of consecutive patients undergoing pharmacologic stress tests with dual isotope gated single photon emission computed tomography. Subjects with Q-wave anterior MI, bundle branch block, or Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome were excluded. We established whether patients met the PRWP criteria. A nuclear cardiologist blinded to PRWP classifications reviewed the scintigrams. Chi2 methods were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 122 subjects. The standard PRWP criteria were met in 15% to 42% of ECGs. Of subjects meeting PRWP criteria, 2% to 9% had anterior MI and 27% to 33% had anterior MI or ischemia. These proportions were similar to those expected by chance. The performance of PRWP criteria did not improve when subjects with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy were excluded or when more stringent criteria for right precordial R-wave amplitude were tested.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study of patients undergoing cardiac stress tests, only a small percentage of patients who met various criteria for PRWP (a proportion no different than would be expected by chance) had anterior MI. Conclusions about the presence of anterior MI solely on the basis of PRWP have little usefulness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15215795     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  3 in total

1.  Complete absence of precordial R waves due to absence of left-sided pericardium.

Authors:  Christian Steinberg; Marie-Josée Pelletier; Jean Champagne
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Clinical significance of reversed R wave progression in right precordial leads.

Authors:  Hiroki Isono; Shigeyuki Watanabe; Chieko Sumiya; Masahiro Toyama; Eiji Ojima; Shunsuke Maruta; Yuta Oishi; Junya Honda; Yasuhisa Kuroda
Journal:  J Rural Med       Date:  2019-05-30

3.  Prevalence and positive predictive value of poor R-wave progression and impact of the cardiothoracic ratio.

Authors:  Sung-Hwan Kim; Mi Hyang Kwak; Hak Jin Kim; Gi-Byoung Nam; Kee-Joon Choi; You-Ho Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.243

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.