Literature DB >> 15215555

Peritumoral brain regions in gliomas and meningiomas: investigation with isotropic diffusion-weighted MR imaging and diffusion-tensor MR imaging.

James M Provenzale1, Peter McGraw, Pradnya Mhatre, Alexander C Guo, David Delong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively measure the diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging characteristics of peritumoral hyperintense white matter (WM) and peritumoral normal-appearing WM, as seen on T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images of infiltrative high-grade gliomas and meningiomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients with biopsy-proved glioma and nine patients with imaging findings consistent with meningioma and an adjacent hyperintense region on T2-weighted MR images were examined with DW and diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were measured on maps generated from isotropic DW images of enhancing tumor, hyperintense regions adjacent to enhancing tumor, normal-appearing WM adjacent to hyperintense regions, and analogous locations in the contralateral WM corresponding to these areas. Fractional anisotropy (FA) was measured in similar locations on maps generated from diffusion-tensor imaging data. Changes in ADC and FA in each type of tissue were compared across tumor types by using a two-sample t test. P <.05 indicated statistical significance.
RESULTS: Mean ADCs in peritumoral hyperintense regions were 1.309 x 10(-3) mm2/sec (mean percentage of 181% of normal WM) for gliomas and 1.427 x 10(-3) mm2/sec (192% of normal value) for meningiomas (no significant difference). Mean ADCs in peritumoral normal-appearing WM were 0.723 x 10(-3) mm2/sec (106% of normal value) for gliomas and 0.743 x 10(-3) mm2/sec (102% of normal value) for meningiomas (no significant difference). Mean FA values in peritumoral hyperintense regions were 0.178 (43% of normal WM value) for gliomas and 0.224 (65% of normal value) for meningiomas (P =.05). Mean FA values for peritumoral normal-appearing WM were 0.375 (83% of normal value) for gliomas and 0.404 (100% of normal value) for meningiomas (P =.01).
CONCLUSION: The difference in FA decreases in peritumoral normal-appearing WM between gliomas and meningiomas was significant, and the difference in FA decreases in peritumoral hyperintense regions between these tumors approached but did not reach significance. These findings may indicate a role for diffusion MR imaging in the detection of tumoral infiltration that is not visible on conventional MR images. Copyright RSNA, 2004

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15215555     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2322030959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  68 in total

Review 1.  Applications of molecular imaging.

Authors:  Craig J Galbán; Stefanie Galbán; Marcian E Van Dort; Gary D Luker; Mahaveer S Bhojani; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.622

2.  The role of white matter dissection technique in modern neuroimaging: can neuroradiologists benefit from its use?

Authors:  Faidon Liakos; Christos Koutsarnakis
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Advances in the assessment of childhood brain tumors and treatment-related sequelae.

Authors:  Katherine E Warren
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Diffusion tensor imaging at the crossroads: fiber tracking meets tissue characterization in brain tumors.

Authors:  Aaron S Field
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  A standardised evaluation of pre-surgical imaging of the corticospinal tract: where to place the seed ROI.

Authors:  Elke Hattingen; Julian Rathert; Alina Jurcoane; Stefan Weidauer; Andrea Szelényi; George Ogrezeanu; Volker Seifert; Friedhelm E Zanella; Thomas Gasser
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Definition of K(trans) and FA thresholds for better assessment of experimental glioma using high-field MRI: a feasibility study.

Authors:  T Engelhorn; M A Schwarz; A Hess; L Budinsky; P Pitann; I Eyüpoglu; A Doerfler
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.649

7.  Unique patterns of diffusion directionality in rat brain tumors revealed by high-resolution diffusion tensor MRI.

Authors:  Jiangyang Zhang; Peter C M van Zijl; John Laterra; Amandeep Salhotra; Bachchu Lal; Susumu Mori; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Apparent diffusion coefficient in vasogenic edema and reactive astrogliosis.

Authors:  Thomas Hagen; Frank Ahlhelm; Werner Reiche
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Diffusion imaging for therapy response assessment of brain tumor.

Authors:  Thomas L Chenevert; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient within enhancing and nonenhancing tumor volumes in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab.

Authors:  Rifaquat Rahman; Alhafidz Hamdan; Rebecca Zweifler; Han Jiang; Andrew D Norden; David A Reardon; Srinivasan Mukundan; Patrick Y Wen; Raymond Y Huang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.