Literature DB >> 15215541

CT colonography: feasibility of substantial dose reduction--comparison of medium to very low doses in identical patients.

Rogier E van Gelder1, Henk W Venema, Jasper Florie, C Yung Nio, Iwo W O Serlie, Michiel P Schutter, Jeroen C van Rijn, Frans M Vos, Afina S Glas, Patrick M M Bossuyt, Joep F W Bartelsman, Johan S Laméris, Jaap Stoker.   

Abstract

In a feasibility study, the authors compared polyp detection and interobserver variability at computed tomographic (CT) colonography in 15 patients with doses ranging from medium to very low (12.00-0.05 mSv). At levels down to 2% of the medium dose, the mean detection of polyps 5 mm or larger remained at least 74%, while the number of false-positive results decreased and the interobserver agreement remained constant. Initial observations indicate that it is feasible to reduce the radiation dose required for CT colonography. Further studies are needed, however, to investigate the clinical value of very low-dose CT colonography. Copyright RSNA, 2004

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15215541     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2322031069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  14 in total

Review 1.  CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks.

Authors:  A Berrington de Gonzalez; Kwang Pyo Kim; Judy Yee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2010-04

2.  Review of a simple noise simulation technique in digital radiography.

Authors:  Rie Tanaka; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Kosuke Matsubara; Hiroki Kawashima
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-04-25

3.  Effective radiation doses in CT colonography: results of an inventory among research institutions.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Jensch; Rogier E van Gelder; Henk W Venema; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Johan S Laméris; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A technique for simulating the effect of dose reduction on image quality in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  Wouter J H Veldkamp; Lucia J M Kroft; Jan Pieter A van Delft; Jacob Geleijns
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Sub-milliSievert (sub-mSv) CT colonography: a prospective comparison of image quality and polyp conspicuity at reduced-dose versus standard-dose imaging.

Authors:  Meghan G Lubner; B Dustin Pooler; Douglas R Kitchin; Jie Tang; Ke Li; David H Kim; Alejandro Munoz del Rio; Guang-Hong Chen; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Radiation dose in CT colonography--trends in time and differences between daily practice and screening protocols.

Authors:  M H Liedenbaum; H W Venema; J Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): climax of a new era of validation and transition into community practice.

Authors:  Jacob Thomas; Jeffrey Carenza; Elizabeth McFarland
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-08

8.  Carbon dioxide insufflation in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection reduces mediastinal emphysema: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Dai Hirasawa; Naotaka Fujita; Tetsuya Ohira; Yoshihiro Harada; Taku Yamagata; Yoshiki Koike; Kenjirou Suzuki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Evaluation of image quality and lesion perception by human readers on 3D CT colonography: comparison of standard and low radiation dose.

Authors:  Valeria A Fisichella; Magnus Båth; Ase Allansdotter Johnsson; Fredrik Jäderling; Tommy Bergsten; Ulf Persson; Kristin Mellingen; Mikael Hellström
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  CT colonography screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Jay P Heiken
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.