OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Endoscopically assisted (minimally invasive) craniosynostosis repair has been suggested as an alternative to traditional open craniosynostosis repair. Advocates of this approach assert advantages, including decreased blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay, while providing esthetic results and safety comparable with traditional open craniosynostosis repair. The difficulties inherent in endoscopic visualization may result in complications, however, that could temper enthusiasm for this procedure. The authors report a child in whom a leptomeningeal cyst developed after performance of endoscopic craniosynostosis repair, presumably from an iatrogenic dural laceration. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 5-month-old girl with sagittal synostosis underwent endoscopically assisted craniosynostosis repair. By report, the procedure was uneventful and the initial results were acceptable. The authors performed a chart review of their own experience with both endoscopically assisted craniosynostosis repair and traditional open repair. INTERVENTION: Five months after surgery, a pulsating forehead mass developed. Neuroimaging confirmed the diagnosis of a leptomeningeal cyst. The child was referred to our pediatric neurosurgery practice for operative repair. At the time of surgery, a dural defect lying directly under a previous osteotomy site was identified. After uneventful repair and follow-up of more than 1 year, the child is well and is without the development of a clinical seizure disorder or recurrence of her leptomeningeal cyst. CONCLUSION: Unrecognized dural injury combined with an overlying osteotomy in an infant can result in the development of a leptomeningeal cyst. Care must be taken at the time of endoscopic extradural surgery to recognize any inadvertent dural tears and to perform a direct repair at the time of the initial occurrence. Facility with and use of an appropriate endoscope is essential to the safe performance of minimally invasive craniosynostosis surgery.
OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Endoscopically assisted (minimally invasive) craniosynostosis repair has been suggested as an alternative to traditional open craniosynostosis repair. Advocates of this approach assert advantages, including decreased blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay, while providing esthetic results and safety comparable with traditional open craniosynostosis repair. The difficulties inherent in endoscopic visualization may result in complications, however, that could temper enthusiasm for this procedure. The authors report a child in whom a leptomeningeal cyst developed after performance of endoscopic craniosynostosis repair, presumably from an iatrogenic dural laceration. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 5-month-old girl with sagittal synostosis underwent endoscopically assisted craniosynostosis repair. By report, the procedure was uneventful and the initial results were acceptable. The authors performed a chart review of their own experience with both endoscopically assisted craniosynostosis repair and traditional open repair. INTERVENTION: Five months after surgery, a pulsating forehead mass developed. Neuroimaging confirmed the diagnosis of a leptomeningeal cyst. The child was referred to our pediatric neurosurgery practice for operative repair. At the time of surgery, a dural defect lying directly under a previous osteotomy site was identified. After uneventful repair and follow-up of more than 1 year, the child is well and is without the development of a clinical seizure disorder or recurrence of her leptomeningeal cyst. CONCLUSION: Unrecognized dural injury combined with an overlying osteotomy in an infant can result in the development of a leptomeningeal cyst. Care must be taken at the time of endoscopic extradural surgery to recognize any inadvertent dural tears and to perform a direct repair at the time of the initial occurrence. Facility with and use of an appropriate endoscope is essential to the safe performance of minimally invasive craniosynostosis surgery.