Literature DB >> 15214003

Molecular characterization of inv dup del(8p): analysis of five cases.

Osamu Shimokawa1, Kenji Kurosawa, Tomoko Ida, Naoki Harada, Tatsuro Kondoh, Noriko Miyake, Kohichiro Yoshiura, Tatsuya Kishino, Tohru Ohta, Norio Niikawa, Naomichi Matsumoto.   

Abstract

We analyzed five patients with inverted duplication deletion of 8p [inv dup del(8p)] using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and short tandem repeat polymorphism (STRP) analysis. In all patients, inv dup del(8p) consisted of a deleted distal segment, an intact in-between segment, and a duplicated proximal segment. In all of them, the proximal breakpoint of the deletion and one of the breakpoints of the duplication were identical, each located at one of the two olfactory receptor gene clusters at 8p23. FISH analysis showed all their mothers to be heterozygous carriers of an 8p23 inversion [inv(8)(p23)]. STRP analysis indicated that the deletions occurred in maternally derived chromosomes. The duplicated segments had two copies of maternal, either heterozygous or homozygous alleles. These findings support and reinforce those in 16 patients with inv dup del(8p) and their parents by Floridia et al. [1996: Am J Hum Genet 58:785-796] and subsequent additional studies of 10 of them by Giglio et al. [2001: Am J Hum Genet 68:874-883]. Based on these findings, we propose a model for the inv dup del(8p) formation. The inverted segment and its normal counterpart in inv(8)(p23) heterozygous carrier mothers form a loop at the pachytene period of meiosis I. Inv dup del(8p) with heterozygous duplication is formed through at least one meiotic recombination within the loop. Inv dup del(8p) with the homozygous duplication arises through two meiotic recombinations on the inv(8)(p23) chromosome (one within the loop and the other between the loop and centromere). Subsequent rescue by eliminating a part of the duplicated segment and a centromere enables formation of viable inv dup del(8p). The frequency of the inv(8)(p23) allele is 39% in a normal Japanese population, comparable to 26% in Europeans Giglio et al. [2001: Am J Hum Genet 68:874-883]. The proposed mechanism of formation of inv dup del(8p) requires two independent events (a recombination within the loop and subsequent rescue), which may explain its rarity. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15214003     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  11 in total

1.  Genotype-phenotype association studies of chromosome 8p inverted duplication deletion syndrome.

Authors:  Gene S Fisch; Ryan Davis; Janey Youngblom; Jeff Gregg
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Genomic profile of copy number variants on the short arm of human chromosome 8.

Authors:  Shihui Yu; Stephanie Fiedler; Andrew Stegner; William D Graf
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Genotype-phenotype correlation of 5p-syndrome: pitfall of diagnosis.

Authors:  Tatsuro Kondoh; Osamu Shimokawa; Naoki Harada; Tomoki Doi; Chyuns Yun; Yuji Gohda; Fumiko Kinoshita; Tadashi Matsumoto; Hiroyuki Moriuchi
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Identification of a 3.0-kb major recombination hotspot in patients with Sotos syndrome who carry a common 1.9-Mb microdeletion.

Authors:  Remco Visser; Osamu Shimokawa; Naoki Harada; Akira Kinoshita; Tohru Ohta; Norio Niikawa; Naomichi Matsumoto
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Chromosome 8p23.1 deletions as a cause of complex congenital heart defects and diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Margaret J Wat; Oleg A Shchelochkov; Ashley M Holder; Amy M Breman; Aditi Dagli; Carlos Bacino; Fernando Scaglia; Roberto T Zori; Sau Wai Cheung; Daryl A Scott; Sung-Hae Lee Kang
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Enhanced genetic maps from family-based disease studies: population-specific comparisons.

Authors:  Chunsheng He; Daniel E Weeks; Steven Buyske; Goncalo R Abecasis; William C Stewart; Tara C Matise
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.103

7.  Polymorphic segmental duplications at 8p23.1 challenge the determination of individual defensin gene repertoires and the assembly of a contiguous human reference sequence.

Authors:  Stefan Taudien; Petra Galgoczy; Klaus Huse; Kathrin Reichwald; Markus Schilhabel; Karol Szafranski; Atsushi Shimizu; Shuichi Asakawa; Adam Frankish; Ivan F Loncarevic; Nobuyoshi Shimizu; Roman Siddiqui; Matthias Platzer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  46,XY,r(8)/45,XY,-8 Mosaicism as a Possible Mechanism of the Imprinted Birk-Barel Syndrome: A Case Study.

Authors:  Anna A Kashevarova; Tatyana V Nikitina; Larisa I Mikhailik; Elena O Belyaeva; Stanislav A Vasilyev; Mariya E Lopatkina; Dmitry A Fedotov; Elizaveta A Fonova; Aleksei A Zarubin; Aleksei A Sivtsev; Nikolay A Skryabin; Lyudmila P Nazarenko; Igor N Lebedev
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Trisomy Xp and partial tetrasomy Xq resulting from gain of a rearranged X chromosome in a female fetus: pathogenic or not?

Authors:  Maria Yiu; Zhongxia Qi; Anita Ki; Jingwei Yu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Clinical Manifestations of Various Molecular Cytogenetic Variants of Eight Cases of "8p Inverted Duplication/Deletion Syndrome".

Authors:  Darya A Yurchenko; Marina E Minzhenkova; Elena L Dadali; Zhanna G Markova; Galina E Rudenskaya; Galina N Matyushchenko; Ilya V Kanivets; Nadezda V Shilova
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.