Literature DB >> 15213905

Comparison between umbilical and transverse right upper abdominal incision for pyloromyotomy.

R M E Blümer1, N S Hessel, R van Baren, C F Kuyper, D C Aronson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Besides laparoscopic pyloromyotomy, the operation for pyloric stenosis has been performed using 2 standard open surgical exposures: the right upper quadrant (RUQ) incision and the semi-circumumbilical (UMB) incision. The aim of this study was to compare the morbidity and cosmetic results of both open exposures.
METHODS: Between 1990 and 1995, we performed 104 pyloromyotomies through a RUQ incision. These operations were retrospectively compared with 133 UMB incisions performed between 1995 and 1999.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding age at presentation, sex, and preoperative status. Only a significantly higher percentage of patients with a metabolic alkalosis before surgery was found in the UMB group, but this did not affect morbidity rate. The groups did not differ significantly with respect to mucosal perforations (P =.95), wound infections (P =.53), inadequate pyloromyotomies (P =.42), or other complications. The mean operating time was slightly longer in the UMB group (P <.025). The UMB approach produced a better cosmetic result, with an almost invisible scar.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that the UMB approach has equal intra- and postoperative complication rates as compared with the RUQ approach. The main advantage of the UMB approach is that it produces an excellent long-term cosmetic result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15213905     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.03.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  5 in total

1.  Can pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis be performed in any hospital? Results from two teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Esther D van den Ende; Jan-Hein Allema; Frans W J Hazebroek; Paul J Breslau
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Shawn D St Peter; George W Holcomb; Casey M Calkins; J Patrick Murphy; Walter S Andrews; Ronald J Sharp; Charles L Snyder; Daniel J Ostlie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Non-laparoscopic minimal surgical approach to pyloromyotomy: An experience from a challenged resource setting.

Authors:  Ossama M Zakaria
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

4.  Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in the Maritimes: examining the waves of change over time.

Authors:  Alexander C Ednie; Ofer Amram; Jenna Colleen Creaser; Nadine Schuurman; Suzanne Leclerc; Natalie Yanchar
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis.

Authors:  Ralph F Staerkle; Fabian Lunger; Lukas Fink; Tom Sasse; Martin Lacher; Erik von Elm; Ahmed I Marwan; Stefan Holland-Cunz; Raphael Nicolas Vuille-Dit-Bille
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.