Literature DB >> 15212731

Evaluation of Pseudomonas sp. PM 11 and Vibrio fluvialis PM 17 on immune indices of tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon.

S V Alavandi1, K K Vijayan, T C Santiago, M Poornima, K P Jithendran, S A Ali, J J S Rajan.   

Abstract

Occurrence of widespread epizootics among cultured stock of shrimp has put research programmes on preventive approaches such as application of probiotics on a high priority in aquaculture. In the present study two bacteria, Pseudomonas sp. PM 11 and Vibrio fluvialis PM 17 were selected as candidate probionts from a pool of bacteria isolated from gut of farm reared sub-adult shrimp and tested for their effect on the immunity indicators of tiger shrimp. Sub-adult shrimp, weighing 14 to 22 g were treated in separate experiments with Pseudomonas sp. PM 11 and V. fluvialis PM 17 at 10(3) bacterial cells ml(-1) in the experimental shrimp culture tanks. One set of experimental animals was treated every 3 days and another set of animals every 7 days with each of the candidate probionts. Estimation of immunological indicators such as haemocyte counts, phenol oxidase and antibacterial activity showed declining trends. The haemocyte counts dropped from 31 x 10(3) to 65 x 10(3) ml(-1) on the first day to 4-16 x 10(3) ml(-1) on the 45th day. Similarly, the phenol oxidase activity declined from 12-32 units on the first day to 11-14 units on 45th day of the experiment. Antibacterial activity of haemolymph reduced to 46-67 percent on the 45th day of the experiment. The results of the study suggest that, the criteria used for the selection of putative probiotic strains in the present study, such as predominant growth on primary isolation media, ability to produce extracellular enzymes and siderophores, did not bring about the desired effect in vivo and improve the immune system in shrimp. Hence, new protocols have to be evolved for selection of microbe(s) as putative probiotics and that, detailed understanding of proven probiotics, employed presently on empirical basis may provide a clue on the selection procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15212731     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2003.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol        ISSN: 1050-4648            Impact factor:   4.581


  5 in total

1.  Probiotics in aquaculture: importance and future perspectives.

Authors:  Maloy Kumar Sahu; N S Swarnakumar; K Sivakumar; T Thangaradjou; L Kannan
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 2.461

2.  Characterization of GP21 and GP12: Two Potential Probiotic Bacteria Isolated from the Gastrointestinal Tract of Atlantic Cod.

Authors:  Carlo C Lazado; Christopher Marlowe A Caipang; Binoy Rajan; Monica F Brinchmann; Viswanath Kiron
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 3.  Evolution of probiotics in aquatic world: Potential effects, the current status in Egypt and recent prospectives.

Authors:  Mai D Ibrahem
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 10.479

4.  Fine Flounder (Paralichthys adspersus) Microbiome Showed Important Differences between Wild and Reared Specimens.

Authors:  Carolina Ramírez; Jaime Romero
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  The Microbiome of Seriola lalandi of Wild and Aquaculture Origin Reveals Differences in Composition and Potential Function.

Authors:  Carolina Ramírez; Jaime Romero
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.