Literature DB >> 15212432

Neural responses to free field and virtual acoustic stimulation in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig.

Oliver Behrend1, Benjamin Dickson, Elizabeth Clarke, Craig Jin, Simon Carlile.   

Abstract

Virtual auditory space (VAS) stimuli based on outer ear transfer functions became increasingly important in spatial hearing research. However, few studies have investigated the match between responses of auditory neurons to VAS and free-field (FF) stimulation. This study validates acoustic spatial receptive fields (SRFs) of 183 individual midbrain units using both VAS and FF stimuli. The first-spike latency, which varied systematically across SRFs, was 14.9 +/- 8.3 (SD) ms in FF, and 15.1 +/- 8.3 ms in VAS. Spike-count-based SRFs measured 0-20 dB above the neural threshold covered on average 44.5 +/- 18.0% of the recorded sphere in FF and 45.5 +/- 18.7% in VAS. The average deviation of the centroid position of SRFs using FF and VAS stimuli was 7.4 degrees azimuth and 3.3 degrees elevation. The average spike rate remained unchanged. The SRF overlap recorded using FF and VAS stimuli (mean: 71.3 +/- 12.6%) or repeated FF stimuli (70.2 +/- 14.2%) was high and strongly correlated (r = 0.96; P < 0.05). The SRF match observed with FF and VAS stimuli was not significantly altered over a range of stimulus levels (paired t-test P = 0.51; n = 6). Randomized VAS barely affected SRF sizes, centroids, or maximum spike count but decreased the average minimum response to 59% compared with sequential stimulation (paired t-test; P = 0.05; n = 26). SRF recordings in VAS excluding the acoustic distortions of the recording equipment differed from those in VAS incorporating the equipment (paired t-test P = 0.01; n = 5). In conclusion, neurophysiological recordings demonstrate that individualized VAS stimuli provided a good simulation of a FF environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15212432     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00402.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  6 in total

1.  Spatial tuning to sound-source azimuth in the inferior colliculus of unanesthetized rabbit.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Kuwada; Brian Bishop; Caitlin Alex; Daniel W Condit; Duck O Kim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Chronic detachable headphones for acoustic stimulation in freely moving animals.

Authors:  Fernando R Nodal; Peter Keating; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Azimuth and envelope coding in the inferior colliculus of the unanesthetized rabbit: effect of reverberation and distance.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Kuwada; Brian Bishop; Duck O Kim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The acoustical cues to sound location in the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus).

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Whitney Williams; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Approaches to the study of neural coding of sound source location and sound envelope in real environments.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Kuwada; Brian Bishop; Duck O Kim
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Responses of neurons in the rat's inferior colliculus to a sound are affected by another sound in a space-dependent manner.

Authors:  Mathiang G Chot; Sarah Tran; Huiming Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.