Literature DB >> 15212171

Simple rules defining the potential of compounds for transdermal delivery or toxicity.

Beatrice M Magnusson1, W John Pugh, Michael S Roberts.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Simple rules based on readily accessible physicochemical properties enable identification of solutes that penetrate skin very slowly or rapidly.
METHODS: Literature in vitro maximal flux values (Jmax) across human skin were collected for 87 penetrants. Penetrants were assigned as "good" (Jmax > 10(-5.52) mole x cm(-2) x h(-1)), "bad" (Jmax < 10(-8.84) mole x cm(-2) x h(-1)) or "intermediate" based on mean +/- 1SD. The feasibility of using readily available physicochemical properties, such as molecular weight (MW), melting point (MP, degrees K), octanol-water partition coefficient (K), water solubility (S, molarity), number of atoms available for H-bonding (HB), in assigning solutes was examined.
RESULTS: Good penetrants had MW < or = 152, log S > -2.3, HB < or = 5, log K < 2.6, MP < or = 432. Bad penetrants had MW > 213, log S < -1.6, HB > or = 4, log K > 1.2, MP > or = 223. Discriminant analysis using MW, HB, log K correctly assigned 70% of compounds. Individual success rates were good (88%), intermediate (58%), bad (93%). Aqueous Jmax data for 148 test solutes were used for validation. Discriminant analysis assigned 76% of compounds, with individual rates of good (76%), intermediate (67%), and bad (97%). No good penetrants were misclassified as bad or vice versa.
CONCLUSIONS: These rules enable rapid screening of potential drug delivery candidates and environmental exposure risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15212171     DOI: 10.1023/b:pham.0000029295.38564.e1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  7 in total

1.  The effect of structural QSAR parameters on skin penetration.

Authors:  T Ghafourian; S Fooladi
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 2.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings.

Authors:  C A Lipinski; F Lombardo; B W Dominy; P J Feeney
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Epidermal permeability-penetrant structure relationships: 4, QSAR of permeant diffusion across human stratum corneum in terms of molecular weight, H-bonding and electronic charge.

Authors:  W J Pugh; I T Degim; J Hadgraft
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2000-03-20       Impact factor: 5.875

4.  Evaluation of a rule base for identifying contact allergens by using a regulatory database: Comparison of data on chemicals notified in the European Union with "structural alerts" used in the DEREK expert system.

Authors:  Stephan Zinke; Ingrid Gerner; Eva Schlede
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.303

5.  Molecular size as the main determinant of solute maximum flux across the skin.

Authors:  Beatrice M Magnusson; Yuri G Anissimov; Sheree E Cross; Michael S Roberts
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for skin corrosivity of organic acids, bases and phenols: Principal components and neural network analysis of extended datasets.

Authors:  M D Barratt
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Predicting skin permeability.

Authors:  R O Potts; R H Guy
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.200

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  A Web-based Tool to Aid the Identification of Chemicals Potentially Posing a Health Risk through Percutaneous Exposure.

Authors:  Melanie Gorman Ng; Antoine Milon; David Vernez; Jérôme Lavoué
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 2.  Modeling kinetics of subcellular disposition of chemicals.

Authors:  Stefan Balaz
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Delivery of siRNA and other macromolecules into skin and cells using a peptide enhancer.

Authors:  Tracy Hsu; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part I: QSAR models of skin sensitization and their application to identify potentially hazardous compounds.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Eugene Muratov; Denis Fourches; Judy Strickland; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Carolina H Andrade; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Use of expert elicitation in the field of occupational hygiene: Comparison of expert and observed data distributions.

Authors:  David Michael Lowry; Lin Fritschi; Benjamin J Mullins; Rebecca A O'Leary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 6.  Surging footprints of mathematical modeling for prediction of transdermal permeability.

Authors:  Neha Goyal; Purva Thatai; Bharti Sapra
Journal:  Asian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 6.598

Review 7.  Vesicular systems for dermal and transdermal drug delivery.

Authors:  Claire Richard; Stéphanie Cassel; Muriel Blanzat
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.361

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.