Literature DB >> 15211189

Immediate endoscopic latissimus dorsi flap: risk or benefit in reconstructing partial mastectomy defects.

Albert Losken1, Timothy G Schaefer, Grant W Carlson, Glyn E Jones, Toncred M Styblo, John Bostwick.   

Abstract

Management of the partial mastectomy defect has become a common entity as a result of the improved popularity and equivalent survival associated with breast conservation therapy (BCT). Numerous reconstructive options have been proposed in select patients following BCT in an attempt to maintain esthetic results. Thirty-nine women underwent simultaneous endoscope-assisted latissimus muscle transfer at the time of resection and were included in this review. The average follow-up was 3.7 years. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics were discussed. Donor site morbidity was acceptable. Tumor recurrence was experienced in 6 patients (15%) following lumpectomy and latissimus reconstruction. Two patients had local recurrence, and 4 had distant recurrence. Thirty-three patients (85%) had no evidence of disease at long-term follow-up. Lumpectomy and latissimus flap transfer was the definitive reconstructive procedure in 33 of the 39 patients (85%). Patients who subsequently required completion mastectomy were easily reconstructed with a TRAM flap or implants. As the management of partial mastectomy defects continues to challenge the plastic surgeon, we are noticing a shift away from immediate simultaneous reconstructions based on arguments regarding the appropriateness from an oncological and reconstructive perspective. Stringent patient selection, confirmation of negative margins, and possibly delaying the latissimus flap transfer will maximize the benefits of this reconstructive modality while limiting the risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15211189     DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000106425.18380.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  6 in total

Review 1.  Present status of endoscopic mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Tetsuhiro Owaki; Yuko Kijima; Heiji Yoshinaka; Munetsugu Hirata; Hiroshi Okumura; Simiya Ishigami; Yasuhito Nerome; Toshiro Takezaki; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-10

2.  Oncological Outcomes and Complications After Volume Replacement Oncoplastic Breast Conservations-The Glasgow Experience.

Authors:  Weiguang Ho; Sheila Stallard; Julie Doughty; Elizabeth Mallon; Laszlo Romics
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2016-12-19

Review 3.  Oncoplastic breast surgery in the setting of breast-conserving therapy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer J Yoon; William Ross Green; Sinae Kim; Thomas Kearney; Bruce G Haffty; Firas Eladoumikdachi; Sharad Goyal
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-09-21

4.  Patient Reported Quality of Life and Aesthetic Satisfaction with Latissimus Dorsi Flap in Immediate Partial and Delayed Total Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Merdan Serin; Sevgi Kurt Yazar
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2018-10-04

Review 5.  From radical mastectomy to breast-conserving therapy and oncoplastic breast surgery: a narrative review comparing oncological result, cosmetic outcome, quality of life, and health economy.

Authors:  Ahmad Kaviani; Nassim Sodagari; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Vahid Eslami; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Amin Safavi; Maryam Noparast; Alfred Fitoussi
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2013-09-12

6.  Selection of oncoplastic surgical technique in Asian breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Eui Sun Shin; Hyo In Kim; Seung Yong Song; Dae Hyun Lew; Dong Won Lee
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.