Literature DB >> 15210006

Shortened dental arch: a review of current treatment concepts.

Vladimir de Sa e Frias1, Randy Toothaker, Robert F Wright.   

Abstract

It is generally assumed that dentition has ceased to be a predominant selection factor in the process of human evolution. With differentiation and reintegration of the human species, gross differences in the morphology and physiology of the stomatognathic system have become apparent. Variability and adaptation of this system have proven that deviations from what may be considered ideal are not pathologic but may, in fact, prove to be a range of normality in this general pattern of evolution. The treatment of patients according to inflexible postulates may be detrimental to the individual patient and the concept of a variable and patient-specific optimal dentition should be considered, especially in the context of the shortened dental arch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15210006     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04016.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  3 in total

Review 1.  Is the shortened dental arch still a satisfactory option?

Authors:  M Manola; F Hussain; B J Millar
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Dental laboratory production of prosthetic restorations in a population in sofia, bulgaria: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Nikola D Damyanov; Dick J Witter; Anneloes E Gerritsen; Nico H J Creugers
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-12-21

Review 3.  Differences in functional outcomes for adult patients with prosthodontically-treated and -untreated shortened dental arches: a systematic review.

Authors:  Saadika Khan; Alfred Musekiwa; Usuf M E Chikte; Ridwaan Omar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.