Literature DB >> 15209410

Development and use of biomarkers in oncology drug development.

Eugenia Floyd1, Teresa M McShane.   

Abstract

Successful development and use of biomarkers will improve the productivity of oncology drug development. Recognition of the importance of biomarkers for speeding drug development is reflected in the precise definitions and concepts proposed by an NIH Working Group to standardize terminology and promote a more coherent and systematic approach to the development and use of biomarkers. Potential clinical biomarkers of drug efficacy are often identified through pre-clinical studies or basic research. Identification of potential biomarkers for use in oncology is moving rapidly forward through continuing advances in clinical imaging technologies, especially molecular and functional imaging. Other rapid advances are a product of the growing availability of new scientific reagents for established technologies and of high-throughput genomic and proteomic technologies that can generate hundreds of potential biomarkers for further evaluation. In certain cases, conventional clinical diagnostic techniques or assays can be adapted for use in pre-clinical models to evaluate their ability to serve as biomarkers for predicting clinical responses to new drug candidates. Evaluation (pre-clinical and clinical) of a potential biomarker is often the longest stage of biomarker development, and standards for evaluation or validation depend on the intended use and stage of clinical development. Biomarkers verified for use in preclinical studies can be used to help select appropriate animal models and lead compounds. Biomarkers verified for use in clinical trials can confirm a drug's pharmacological or biological mechanism of action, guide protocol design, aid patient and dose selection, and help to minimize safety risks. Oncology drug development can be optimized by using a tiered set of clinical biomarkers that predict compound efficacy and safety with increasing confidence at each rise in tier thereby aiding corporate decision-making about advancing compounds. In oncology, a special class of extensively evaluated biomarkers of efficacy (surrogate endpoints) that generally correlate with desired clinical outcomes can be used as a basis for corporate decisions as well as for gaining accelerated provisional regulatory approval of a drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15209410     DOI: 10.1080/01926230490425021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  11 in total

Review 1.  Advancing outcome measures for the new era of drug development in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Nicole Mayer-Hamblett; Bonnie W Ramsey; Richard A Kronmal
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2007-08-01

Review 2.  Translational research in phase I trials.

Authors:  Angelica Fasolo; Cristiana Sessa
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Model system using controlled receptor expression for evaluating targeted ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Reshu Saini; Jason M Warram; Anna G Sorace; Heidi Umphrey; Kurt R Zinn; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 4.  OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Soluble biomarker assessments in clinical trials in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  V B Kraus; F J Blanco; M Englund; Y Henrotin; L S Lohmander; E Losina; P Önnerfjord; S Persiani
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Evaluation of treatment-associated inflammatory response on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography imaging biomarkers.

Authors:  Craig J Galbán; Mahaveer S Bhojani; Kuei C Lee; Charles R Meyer; Marcian E Van Dort; Kyle K Kuszpit; Robert A Koeppe; Rajesh Ranga; Bradford A Moffat; Timothy D Johnson; Thomas L Chenevert; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Molecular imaging of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 expression using targeted contrast-enhanced high-frequency ultrasonography.

Authors:  Andrej Lyshchik; Arthur C Fleischer; Jessica Huamani; Dennis E Hallahan; Marcela Brissova; John C Gore
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Validity of clinical associations of biomarkers in translational research studies: the case of systemic autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  Maria G Tektonidou; Michael M Ward
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 5.156

8.  Identification of potential glycan cancer markers with sialic acid attached to sialic acid and up-regulated fucosylated galactose structures in epidermal growth factor receptor secreted from A431 cell line.

Authors:  Shiaw-Lin Wu; Allen D Taylor; Qiaozhen Lu; Samir M Hanash; Hogune Im; Michael Snyder; William S Hancock
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Metabolomics based predictive classifier for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Keith Unger; Khyati Y Mehta; Prabhjit Kaur; Yiwen Wang; Smrithi S Menon; Shreyans K Jain; Rose A Moonjelly; Shubhankar Suman; Kamal Datta; Rajbir Singh; Paul Fogel; Amrita K Cheema
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-05-01

10.  Metabolomic biomarkers of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Khyati Y Mehta; Hung-Jen Wu; Smrithi S Menon; Yassi Fallah; Xiaogang Zhong; Nasser Rizk; Keith Unger; Mark Mapstone; Massimo S Fiandaca; Howard J Federoff; Amrita K Cheema
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.