Literature DB >> 15209097

Detecting hemifacial asymmetries in emotional expression with three-dimensional computerized image analysis.

Michael E R Nicholls1, Brooke E Ellis, John G Clement, Mineo Yoshino.   

Abstract

Emotions are expressed more clearly on the left side of the face than the right: an asymmetry that probably stems from right hemisphere dominance for emotional expression (right hemisphere model). More controversially, it has been suggested that the left hemiface bias is stronger for negative emotions and weaker or reversed for positive emotions (valence model). We examined the veracity of the right hemisphere and valence models by measuring asymmetries in: (i) movement of the face; and (ii) observer's rating of emotionality. The study uses a precise three-dimensional (3D) imaging technique to measure facial movement and to provide images that simultaneously capture the left or right hemifaces. Models (n = 16) with happy, sad and neutral expressions were digitally captured and manipulated. Comparison of the neutral and happy or sad images revealed greater movement of the left hemiface, regardless of the valence of the emotion, supporting the right hemisphere model. There was a trend, however, for left-sided movement to be more pronounced for negative than positive emotions. Participants (n = 357) reported that portraits rotated so that the left hemiface was featured, were more expressive of negative emotions whereas right hemiface portraits were more expressive for positive emotions, supporting the valence model. The effect of valence was moderated when the images were mirror-reversed. The data demonstrate that relatively small rotations of the head have a dramatic effect on the expression of positive and negative emotions. The fact that the effect of valence was not captured by the movement analysis demonstrates that subtle movements can have a strong effect on the expression of emotion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15209097      PMCID: PMC1691649          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  31 in total

1.  Facial asymmetry during emotional expression: gender, valence, and measurement technique.

Authors:  J C Borod; E Koff; S Yecker; C Santschi; J M Schmidt
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Assessment of facial features with a range camera.

Authors:  K Strömland; Y Chen; G Michael; E Svensson; T Gustavsson
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg       Date:  1998-03

3.  Hemiregional variations in facial expression of emotions.

Authors:  H S Asthana; M K Mandal
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1997-08

Review 4.  The neurobiology of emotional experience.

Authors:  K M Heilman
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.198

5.  Neuropsychological aspects of facial asymmetry during emotional expression: a review of the normal adult literature.

Authors:  J C Borod; C S Haywood; E Koff
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  Lateralization for the expression and perception of facial emotion as a function of age.

Authors:  C R Moreno; J C Borod; J Welkowitz; M Alpert
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Facial asymmetry while posing positive and negative emotions: support for the right hemisphere hypothesis.

Authors:  J C Borod; J Kent; E Koff; C Martin; M Alpert
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Patterns of perceptual asymmetry in processing facial expression.

Authors:  S Magnussen; B Sunde; S Dyrnes
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Asymmetries for hemiface size and mobility.

Authors:  E Koff; J C Borod; B White
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Facedness and emotion related to lateral dominance, sex and expression type.

Authors:  J C Borod; H S Caron
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  7 in total

1.  Asymmetry of blinking.

Authors:  Iris S Kassem; Craig Evinger
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Facial asymmetry in young healthy subjects evaluated by statistical shape analysis.

Authors:  Ilker Ercan; Senem Turan Ozdemir; Abdullah Etoz; Deniz Sigirli; R Shane Tubbs; Marios Loukas; Ibrahim Guney
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Orienting asymmetries and physiological reactivity in dogs' response to human emotional faces.

Authors:  Marcello Siniscalchi; Serenella d'Ingeo; Angelo Quaranta
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 4.  Pupil dilations reflect why rembrandt biased female portraits leftward and males rightward.

Authors:  James A Schirillo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Hemiface Differences in Visual Exploration Patterns When Judging the Authenticity of Facial Expressions.

Authors:  Yuri Busin; Katerina Lukasova; Manish K Asthana; Elizeu C Macedo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-10

6.  Consistently Showing Your Best Side? Intra-individual Consistency in #Selfie Pose Orientation.

Authors:  Annukka K Lindell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-21

7.  The Influence of Facial Asymmetry on Genuineness Judgment.

Authors:  Bérénice Delor; Fabien D'Hondt; Pierre Philippot
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-11-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.