Literature DB >> 15209042

Continuous and robust measures of the overweight epidemic: 1971-2000.

Dean Jolliffe1.   

Abstract

This article considers alternate measures of the overweight epidemic that are more robust to measurement error, continuous in the body-mass index (BMI) at the overweight threshold, and sensitive to changes in the BMI distribution. The measures suggest that prevalence rates may understate the severity of the overweight problem. Since 1971, the prevalence of overweight has increased by 37%, while the distribution-sensitive measure has increased by 173%. Furthermore, although Hispanics have the highest prevalence of overweight, the distribution-sensitive measures reveal that overweight Hispanics exceed the overweight threshold by the smallest proportion (21%), whereas overweight non-Hispanic blacks exceed the threshold by 33%, on average.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15209042     DOI: 10.1353/dem.2004.0015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Demography        ISSN: 0070-3370


  9 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for healthy weight.

Authors:  W C Willett; W H Dietz; G A Colditz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-08-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Changes in the distribution of body mass index of adults and children in the US population.

Authors:  K M Flegal; R P Troiano
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-07

3.  Body mass index (weight/height2) or percentage body fat by bioelectrical impedance analysis: which variable better reflects serum lipid profile?

Authors:  T Nagaya; H Yoshida; H Takahashi; Y Matsuda; M Kawai
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1999-07

Review 4.  Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults--The Evidence Report. National Institutes of Health.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  1998-09

5.  Body mass index and the risk of stroke in men.

Authors:  Tobias Kurth; J Michael Gaziano; Klaus Berger; Carlos S Kase; Kathryn M Rexrode; Nancy R Cook; Julie E Buring; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002 Dec 9-23

6.  Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1995

7.  How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex, and ethnic groups?

Authors:  D Gallagher; M Visser; D Sepúlveda; R N Pierson; T Harris; S B Heymsfield
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Obesity and the risk of heart failure.

Authors:  Satish Kenchaiah; Jane C Evans; Daniel Levy; Peter W F Wilson; Emelia J Benjamin; Martin G Larson; William B Kannel; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Obesity, disease, and functional limitation in later life.

Authors:  C L Himes
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2000-02
  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  A Prospective Examination of the Mechanisms Linking Childhood Physical Abuse to Body Mass Index in Adulthood.

Authors:  Melville M Francis; Valentina Nikulina; Cathy Spatz Widom
Journal:  Child Maltreat       Date:  2015-02-02

2.  An intervention for multiethnic obese parents and overweight children.

Authors:  Diane Berry; Mary Savoye; Gail Melkus; Margaret Grey
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.257

3.  Creatinine-based equations for the adjustment of drug dosage in an obese population.

Authors:  Antoine Bouquegneau; Emmanuelle Vidal-Petiot; Olivier Moranne; Christophe Mariat; Jean-Jacques Boffa; François Vrtovsnik; André-Jean Scheen; Jean-Marie Krzesinski; Martin Flamant; Pierre Delanaye
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-01-17       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Measuring Socioeconomic Inequality in Obesity: Looking Beyond the Obesity Threshold.

Authors:  Marcel Bilger; Eliza J Kruger; Eric A Finkelstein
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.046

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.