M Thomas1, K Mackway-Jones, N Boreham. 1. Emergency Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To develop a graded classification system for risks in emergency medicine. To test the inter-user reliability of this classification system. DESIGN: Prospective collection of data involving emergency department (ED) critical incidents. Derivation of classification system using the collected critical incidents. Comparison of results of classification of a sample of the critical incidents between different users of the system. SETTING: EDs in two teaching hospitals and two district general hospitals (DGHs) in the north west of England. INTERVENTIONS: Observational study. MAIN OUTCOMES: Classification system itself. Results of classification of same critical incidents by different users. RESULTS: 816 critical incidents were identified and used to derive a typology. This typology was found to have inter-user reliability score of 86% (95% confidence intervals 76.4% to 95.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The typology that has been derived is a reliable tool for the classification of risks in emergency medicine.
OBJECTIVES: To develop a graded classification system for risks in emergency medicine. To test the inter-user reliability of this classification system. DESIGN: Prospective collection of data involving emergency department (ED) critical incidents. Derivation of classification system using the collected critical incidents. Comparison of results of classification of a sample of the critical incidents between different users of the system. SETTING: EDs in two teaching hospitals and two district general hospitals (DGHs) in the north west of England. INTERVENTIONS: Observational study. MAIN OUTCOMES: Classification system itself. Results of classification of same critical incidents by different users. RESULTS: 816 critical incidents were identified and used to derive a typology. This typology was found to have inter-user reliability score of 86% (95% confidence intervals 76.4% to 95.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The typology that has been derived is a reliable tool for the classification of risks in emergency medicine.
Authors: R K Webb; M Currie; C A Morgan; J A Williamson; P Mackay; W J Russell; W B Runciman Journal: Anaesth Intensive Care Date: 1993-10 Impact factor: 1.669
Authors: T A Brennan; L L Leape; N M Laird; L Hebert; A R Localio; A G Lawthers; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H H Hiatt Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-02-07 Impact factor: 91.245