Literature DB >> 15208050

Contraceptive use and risk of unintended pregnancy in California.

Diana G Foster1, Julia Bley, John Mikanda, Marta Induni, Abigail Arons, Nikki Baumrind, Philip D Darney, Felicia Stewart.   

Abstract

California is home to more than one out of eight American women of reproductive age. Because California has a large, diverse and growing population, national statistics do not necessarily describe the reproductive health of California women. This article presents risk for pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections among women in California based on the California Women's Health Survey. Over 8900 women of reproductive age who participated in this survey between 1998 and 2001 provide estimates of access to care and use of family-planning methods in the state. We find that 49% of the female population aged 18-44 in California is at risk of unintended pregnancy. Nine percent (9%) of women at risk of an unintended pregnancy are not using any method of contraception, primarily for method-related reasons, such as a concern about side effects or a dislike of available contraceptive methods. Among women at risk for unintended pregnancy, we find disparities by race/ethnicity and education in use of contraceptive methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15208050     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  18 in total

1.  Public savings from the prevention of unintended pregnancy: a cost analysis of family planning services in California.

Authors:  Gorette Amaral; Diana Greene Foster; M Antonia Biggs; Carolyn Bradner Jasik; Signy Judd; Claire D Brindis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Is a previous unplanned pregnancy a risk factor for a subsequent unplanned pregnancy?

Authors:  Lindsay M Kuroki; Jenifer E Allsworth; Colleen A Redding; Jeffrey D Blume; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Racial and ethnic disparities in contraceptive method choice in California.

Authors:  Grace Shih; Eric Vittinghoff; Jody Steinauer; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-08-01

4.  Race and reproductive coercion: a qualitative assessment.

Authors:  Cara Nikolajski; Elizabeth Miller; Heather L McCauley; Aletha Akers; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Lori Freedman; Julia Steinberg; Said Ibrahim; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015-03-05

5.  State Prescription Contraception Insurance Mandates: Effects on Unintended Births.

Authors:  Emily M Johnston; E Kathleen Adams
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Development of a brief questionnaire to assess contraceptive intent.

Authors:  Tina R Raine-Bennett; Corinne H Rocca
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-06-03

7.  Understanding pregnancy-related attitudes and behaviors: a mixed-methods study of homeless youth.

Authors:  Joan S Tucker; Jesse Sussell; Daniela Golinelli; Annie Zhou; David P Kennedy; Suzanne L Wenzel
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2012-11-13

Review 8.  Disparities in family planning.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Maria Isabel Rodriguez; Kira Levy; Sonya Borrero; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Parental Gender Expectations by Socioeconomic Status and Nativity: Implications for Contraceptive Use.

Authors:  Goleen Samari; Kate Coleman-Minahan
Journal:  Sex Roles       Date:  2017-08-22

10.  Contraceptive Method Choice Among Young Adults: Influence of Individual and Relationship Factors.

Authors:  S Marie Harvey; Lisa P Oakley; Isaac Washburn; Christopher R Agnew
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2018-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.