Literature DB >> 15208049

Emergency contraception: why can't you give it away? Qualitative findings from an evaluation of advance provision of emergency contraception.

Karen Fairhurst1, Sue Ziebland, Sally Wyke, Peter Seaman, Anna Glasier.   

Abstract

The Lothian Emergency Contraception Project (LECP)--a primary care-based intervention to offer advance supplies of emergency contraception (EC) to women aged 16-29 was not associated with a reduction in abortion rates. We undertook case studies, utilizing qualitative and quantitative methods, to evaluate the intervention. In this article we present findings from qualitative interviews with 44 primary care professionals working at case study sites and 22 women who had received advance supplies to explain this failure. Professionals reported that women rarely asked for advance supplies of EC and they were reluctant to offer supplies to women because of concerns about contradictory sexual health messages implied by the offer, a perceived association of EC use with chaotic behavior by women, views about the sort of women suitable for advance supplies and practical difficulties making the offer. Women were reluctant to ask for advance supplies because of misgivings about the appropriateness of offering advance supplies to everybody and concerns about being judged by health professionals as morally inadequate. If advance provision of EC is to be successful in reducing abortion rates, professionals must address their concerns about EC and develop imaginative ways of encouraging women most at risk of unwanted pregnancy to take supplies home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15208049     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  6 in total

1.  Harm or Mere Inconvenience? Denying Women Emergency Contraception.

Authors:  Carolyn McLeod
Journal:  Hypatia       Date:  2010

2.  Obstetrician-gynecologist physicians' beliefs about emergency contraception: a national survey.

Authors:  Ryan E Lawrence; Kenneth A Rasinski; John D Yoon; Farr A Curlin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Effect of a single vaginal administration of levonorgestrel in Carraguard gel on the ovulatory process: a potential candidate for "dual protection" emergency contraception.

Authors:  Vivian Brache; Horacio Croxatto; Regine Sitruk-Ware; Robin Maguire; Juan Carlos Montero; Narender Kumar; Ana Maria Salvatierra; Ana Sofia Tejada; Leila Cochón; María Luisa Forcelledo; Pekka Lahteenmaki; Francisco Alvarez; Anibal Faundes
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Perceptions of vaginal microbicides as an HIV prevention method among health care providers in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Authors:  Gita Ramjee; Neetha S Morar; James Mtimkulu; Joanne E Mantell; Varanna Gharbaharan
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 2.250

5.  Discourses on the postcoital pill in young women.

Authors:  M L Bauzà-Amengual; M Esteva; M Ingla-Pol; M A Font-Oliver; S March
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Systematic Review of the profile of emergency contraception users.

Authors:  Maria de Lluc Bauzà Amengual; Magdalena Esteva Canto; Inmaculada Pereiro Berenguer; Maria Ingla Pol
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2016-07-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.