BACKGROUND: Little is known about acceptance of skin cancer risk-reduction practices and attitudes among individuals with a family history of melanoma. The purpose of this study was to examine engagement in and correlates of sun protection, total cutaneous examination (TCE), and skin self-examination (SSE) among first-degree relatives (FDR) of individuals diagnosed with malignant melanoma (MM). METHOD: First degree relatives (N = 229) completed measures of engagement in TCE, SSE, and habitual sun protection, as well as measures of knowledge and attitudes about all three behaviors. RESULTS: Slightly more than 50% of family members reported having TCE, and engagement in habitual sun protection was relatively low. Engagement in SSE was higher. Regression analyses revealed that physician recommendation and perceived barriers were consistent correlates of all three risk-reduction behaviors. Self-efficacy and normative influences were also associated with sun protection. CONCLUSIONS: Engagement in skin cancer risk-reduction practices among individuals with a family history of melanoma is relatively low. Interventions to improve acceptance would benefit from targeting both nonpsychological and psychological factors, particularly physician influence and perceived barriers. Copyright 2004 The Institute for Cancer Prevention and Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about acceptance of skin cancer risk-reduction practices and attitudes among individuals with a family history of melanoma. The purpose of this study was to examine engagement in and correlates of sun protection, total cutaneous examination (TCE), and skin self-examination (SSE) among first-degree relatives (FDR) of individuals diagnosed with malignant melanoma (MM). METHOD: First degree relatives (N = 229) completed measures of engagement in TCE, SSE, and habitual sun protection, as well as measures of knowledge and attitudes about all three behaviors. RESULTS: Slightly more than 50% of family members reported having TCE, and engagement in habitual sun protection was relatively low. Engagement in SSE was higher. Regression analyses revealed that physician recommendation and perceived barriers were consistent correlates of all three risk-reduction behaviors. Self-efficacy and normative influences were also associated with sun protection. CONCLUSIONS: Engagement in skin cancer risk-reduction practices among individuals with a family history of melanoma is relatively low. Interventions to improve acceptance would benefit from targeting both nonpsychological and psychological factors, particularly physician influence and perceived barriers. Copyright 2004 The Institute for Cancer Prevention and Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Elyse Shuk; Jack E Burkhalter; Carlos F Baguer; Susan M Holland; Alisa Pinkhasik; Mary Sue Brady; Daniel G Coit; Charlotte E Ariyan; Jennifer L Hay Journal: Qual Health Res Date: 2012-07
Authors: Sharon Manne; Paul B Jacobsen; Michael E Ming; Gary Winkel; Sophie Dessureault; Stuart R Lessin Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Bridget G Parsons; Jennifer L Hay; Lisa G Aspinwall; Kelsey Zaugg; Angela Zhu; Ryan H Mooney; Stephanie Z Klein; Douglas Grossman; Sancy A Leachman; Yelena P Wu Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Urvi J Mujumdar; Jennifer L Hay; Yvette C Monroe-Hinds; Amanda J Hummer; Colin B Begg; Homer B Wilcox; Susan A Oliveria; Marianne Berwick Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Yelena P Wu; Lisa G Aspinwall; Bridgid M Conn; Tammy Stump; Bridget Grahmann; Sancy A Leachman Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-04-16 Impact factor: 4.018