BACKGROUND: The Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ) is a frequently used screening instrument in the research on Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD). Nevertheless, studies on its reliability and validity are relatively scarce. In the present study the reliability and the contrast validity of the SPAQ are investigated. METHODS: SAD patients, selected by means of a clinical interview, non-seasonal depressed out-patients, non-depressed out-patients, and a control group, are contrasted to estimate the discriminating power of the SPAQ. Also, the reliability and factor structure of the seasonality and the climate subscales are investigated. To study food intake the Seasonal Food Preference Questionnaire (SFPQ) was developed. RESULTS: The SAD criterion of the SPAQ shows good specificity (94%), but a low sensitivity (44%). Discriminant analysis shows sufficient ability to classify subjects (81% correctly classified). The Global Seasonality Scale has a good internal consistency. It consists of two factors, a psychological factor and a food factor. The SFPQ is sensitive for carbohydrate intake by SAD patients. LIMITATIONS: Most SAD patients had received treatment and completed the SPAQ while they were not depressed, which may have influenced the sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The SPAQ is not sensitive enough to be considered a diagnostic instrument for SAD. Nevertheless, it is accurate enough to be used as a screenings instrument. The only false positives were found in the depressive group. The accuracy of prevalence Figs. can be improved by completion of the SPAQ in the summer months, combined with the completion of a depression scale. Copyright 2003 Elsevier B.V.
BACKGROUND: The Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ) is a frequently used screening instrument in the research on Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD). Nevertheless, studies on its reliability and validity are relatively scarce. In the present study the reliability and the contrast validity of the SPAQ are investigated. METHODS:SADpatients, selected by means of a clinical interview, non-seasonal depressed out-patients, non-depressed out-patients, and a control group, are contrasted to estimate the discriminating power of the SPAQ. Also, the reliability and factor structure of the seasonality and the climate subscales are investigated. To study food intake the Seasonal Food Preference Questionnaire (SFPQ) was developed. RESULTS: The SAD criterion of the SPAQ shows good specificity (94%), but a low sensitivity (44%). Discriminant analysis shows sufficient ability to classify subjects (81% correctly classified). The Global Seasonality Scale has a good internal consistency. It consists of two factors, a psychological factor and a food factor. The SFPQ is sensitive for carbohydrate intake by SADpatients. LIMITATIONS: Most SADpatients had received treatment and completed the SPAQ while they were not depressed, which may have influenced the sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The SPAQ is not sensitive enough to be considered a diagnostic instrument for SAD. Nevertheless, it is accurate enough to be used as a screenings instrument. The only false positives were found in the depressive group. The accuracy of prevalence Figs. can be improved by completion of the SPAQ in the summer months, combined with the completion of a depression scale. Copyright 2003 Elsevier B.V.
Authors: S B Patten; J V A Williams; D H Lavorato; A G M Bulloch; K M Fiest; J L Wang; T T Sajobi Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 6.892
Authors: Hyacinth N Uzoma; Gloria M Reeves; Patricia Langenberg; Baharak Khabazghazvini; Theodora G Balis; Mary A Johnson; Aamar Sleemi; Debra A Scrandis; Sarah A Zimmerman; Dipika Vaswani; Gagan Virk Nijjar; Johanna Cabassa; Manana Lapidus; Kelly J Rohan; Teodor T Postolache Journal: World J Psychiatry Date: 2015-03-22
Authors: Kathryn A Roecklein; Patricia M Wong; Peter L Franzen; Brant P Hasler; W Michael Wood-Vasey; Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar; Megan A Miller; Kyle M Kepreos; Robert E Ferrell; Stephen B Manuck Journal: Chronobiol Int Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Brenda W J H Penninx; Aartjan T F Beekman; Johannes H Smit; Frans G Zitman; Willem A Nolen; Philip Spinhoven; Pim Cuijpers; Peter J De Jong; Harm W J Van Marwijk; Willem J J Assendelft; Klaas Van Der Meer; Peter Verhaak; Michel Wensing; Ron De Graaf; Witte J Hoogendijk; Johan Ormel; Richard Van Dyck Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2008 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Eve Reynaud; Fabrice Berna; Emmanuel Haffen; Luisa Weiner; Julia Maruani; Michel Lejoyeux; Carmen M Schroder; Patrice Bourgin; Pierre A Geoffroy Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Ani Englund; Leena Kovanen; Sirkku T Saarikoski; Jari Haukka; Antti Reunanen; Arpo Aromaa; Jouko Lönnqvist; Timo Partonen Journal: J Circadian Rhythms Date: 2009-05-26