Literature DB >> 15207427

Effectiveness and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors in elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease: a "real world" study.

E Mossello1, E Tonon, V Caleri, S Tilli, C Cantini, M C Cavallini, F Bencini, R Mecacci, M Marini, F Bardelli, E Sarcone, E Razzi, C A Biagini, G Masotti.   

Abstract

Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) in improving cognitive status and disability in subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, little is known about the effectiveness of ChEI in clinical practice, and no large clinical trials comparing different ChEI are available at present. Aim of this study was to evaluate safety and effectiveness of ChEI in a sample of elderly outpatients diagnosed with mild to moderate AD. We selected 407 subjects for ChEI treatment (donepezil,rivastigmine or galantamine). Their cognitive function was evaluated by means of the mini mental state examination (MMSE), and the global functional status was estimated by using the activities of daily living (ADL) and the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales at baseline (To), then after 1 (T1), 3 (T2) and 9 months (T3), respectively. T3 follow-up was completed by 212 subjects. The patients were considered as responders (R), if the MMSEscore at T2 was unchanged or improved, if compared to that of T0. In 35 patients (8.6 %)treatment was withdrawn because of mostly gastrointestinal adverse events. Compared to the other drugs, donepezil was associated with a lower incidence of withdrawals due to adverse events. Subjects who completed T3 follow-up (age 78 +/- 6 years, MMSE scores 18.8 +/- 3.9) showed an increase at T2 of 0.7 +/- 2.7 (p = 0.001) and a decrease at T3 of -0.6 +/- 3.4 (p = 0.008) in the MMSE scores, as compared to To . The ADL and IADL scores did not show significant changes at T2; however, both decreased significantly at T3. The patients Rat-T2 showed a better cognitive and functional outcome at T3 , compared to the nonresponders(NR-at-T2), displaying values of MMSE R-at-T2 0.4 +/- 3.1 vs. NR-at-T2 -3.0 +/- 2.5, p = 0.001, and ADL values of -0.3 +/- 1.2 vs. -0.7 +/- 1.3, p = 0.03, respectively. No significant difference was found in the changes of MMSE scores between donepezil and rivastigmine (galantamine was not included in the comparison due to the small number of treated subjects). In conclusion, in this sample of elderly subjects with mild to moderate AD,treated with ChEI, a small but significant decline in cognitive and functional status was observed after 9 months. Subjects who showed a good response to treatment after 3 months, had a better cognitive and functional outcome at 9 months. No significant difference in cognitive outcome was found between drugs, while donepezil was better tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15207427     DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr Suppl        ISSN: 0924-7947


  9 in total

Review 1.  Current and emerging drug treatment options for Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nathan Herrmann; Sarah A Chau; Ida Kircanski; Krista L Lanctôt
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Predictors of response to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in dementia: A systematic review.

Authors:  Federico Emanuele Pozzi; Elisa Conti; Ildebrando Appollonio; Carlo Ferrarese; Lucio Tremolizzo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Effects of donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine in 938 Italian patients with Alzheimer's disease: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Aurelia Santoro; Paola Siviero; Nadia Minicuci; Elena Bellavista; Michele Mishto; Fabiola Olivieri; Francesca Marchegiani; Andrea Maria Chiamenti; Luisa Benussi; Roberta Ghidoni; Benedetta Nacmias; Silvia Bagnoli; Andrea Ginestroni; Osvaldo Scarpino; Emidio Feraco; Walter Gianni; Guido Cruciani; Roberto Paganelli; Angelo Di Iorio; Mario Scognamiglio; Luigi Maria Edoardo Grimaldi; Carlo Gabelli; Sandro Sorbi; Giuliano Binetti; Gaetano Crepaldi; Claudio Franceschi
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Long-term course and effectiveness of combination therapy in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Alireza Atri; Lynn W Shaughnessy; Joseph J Locascio; John H Growdon
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.703

5.  Management of patients with Alzheimer's disease: pharmacological treatment and quality of life.

Authors:  Enrico Mossello; Elena Ballini
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Effects of donepezil on the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations in the brain of patients with Alzheimer's disease: evidence from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Hua Yang; Jiangtao Zhang; Jianan Cheng
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Predictors of long-term cognitive outcome in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Carina Wattmo; Asa K Wallin; Elisabet Londos; Lennart Minthon
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.982

8.  Donepezil in Alzheimer's disease: an evidence-based review of its impact on clinical and economic outcomes.

Authors:  Joanne Knowles
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2006-03-31

9.  Functional response to cholinesterase inhibitor therapy in a naturalistic Alzheimer's disease cohort.

Authors:  Carina Wattmo; Asa K Wallin; Lennart Minthon
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.474

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.