OBJECTIVES: To obtain a Spanish version of the CHIP-CE semantically and culturally equivalent to the original version. METHOD: The methodology used was based on the forward-backward method. Two translations into Spanish were performed. After the first reconciled version, 44 cognitive interviews were carried out with children aged 6-11 years old, selected from two schools in Barcelona. The interviews were recorded and transcribed. A qualitative content analysis of the textual data was carried out. A panel of experts developed the second reconciled version taking into account the children's comments. A back-translation into English was carried out and was compared with the original version. RESULTS: Of a total of 45 items induced in the first reconciled version, 21 were considered equivalent, 23 required changes and 1 was considered not equivalent. Comprehension of abstract concepts differed according to age. Older children differentiated among concepts and gave different examples of experiences related to these concepts, while younger children (6 to 7-year olds) provided similar examples for different concepts. The children's comments were used in the reformulation of the items. An illustrative figure reinforced understanding. Children aged 7 or more started to use an adequate recall period and used the response options correctly. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the CHIP-CE seems appropriate for children aged 6-11 in Spain. The present study shows that children from the age of 6 years onwards are able to describe the health concepts included in the CHIP-CE.
OBJECTIVES: To obtain a Spanish version of the CHIP-CE semantically and culturally equivalent to the original version. METHOD: The methodology used was based on the forward-backward method. Two translations into Spanish were performed. After the first reconciled version, 44 cognitive interviews were carried out with children aged 6-11 years old, selected from two schools in Barcelona. The interviews were recorded and transcribed. A qualitative content analysis of the textual data was carried out. A panel of experts developed the second reconciled version taking into account the children's comments. A back-translation into English was carried out and was compared with the original version. RESULTS: Of a total of 45 items induced in the first reconciled version, 21 were considered equivalent, 23 required changes and 1 was considered not equivalent. Comprehension of abstract concepts differed according to age. Older children differentiated among concepts and gave different examples of experiences related to these concepts, while younger children (6 to 7-year olds) provided similar examples for different concepts. The children's comments were used in the reformulation of the items. An illustrative figure reinforced understanding. Children aged 7 or more started to use an adequate recall period and used the response options correctly. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the CHIP-CE seems appropriate for children aged 6-11 in Spain. The present study shows that children from the age of 6 years onwards are able to describe the health concepts included in the CHIP-CE.
Authors: Anne W Riley; David Coghill; Christopher B Forrest; Maria J Lorenzo; Stephen J Ralston; Georg Spiel Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Anne W Riley; Georg Spiel; David Coghill; Manfred Döpfner; Bruno Falissard; Maria J Lorenzo; Ulrich Preuss; Stephen J Ralston Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Maria-Dolors Estrada; Luis Rajmil; Michael Herdman; Vicky Serra-Sutton; Cristian Tebé; Jordi Alonso; Anne W Riley; Christopher B Forrest; Barbara Starfield Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-08-14 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Maria-Dolors Estrada; Luis Rajmil; Vicky Serra-Sutton; Cristian Tebé; Jordi Alonso; Michael Herdman; Anne W Riley; Christopher B Forrest; Barbara Starfield Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2010-08-02 Impact factor: 3.186