Literature DB >> 15207040

Behavioural assessment of the effects of tumour growth in rats and the influence of the analgesics carprofen and meloxicam.

John V Roughan1, Paul A Flecknell, Barry R Davies.   

Abstract

Very little is known concerning the occurrence of pain in cancer research models. We wished to establish whether a behaviour-based approach, originally developed to assess postoperative pain, could be used to determine positive effects of the analgesics carprofen and meloxicam in rats that might be experiencing pain during tumour development in an orthotopic model of bladder cancer. An invasive but non-metastatic rat bladder cancer cell line was surgically implanted into the bladder wall of 57 inbred Fisher344 rats. The rats underwent daily clinical assessments. When clinical signs consistent with chronic pain were apparent, behavioural data were collected from 44 animals during 2 x 10 min periods, immediately before and one hour after a subcutaneous injection of either physiological saline (0.9%; 0.2 ml/100 g), carprofen (5 mg/kg) or meloxicam (2 mg/kg). Treatment-associated behaviour changes were then compared between groups. The lack of active behaviour, both before and after each treatment, was consistent with established clinical signs of pain. The rats were so inactive following the treatment that the behavioural technique we had previously developed was of comparatively little use in determining either pain severity or analgesic efficacy. One very prominent effect, however, was an increase in ventral abdominal licking in the control (saline) group. As this was absent in rats given meloxicam or carprofen, and has previously been considered to indicate pain emanating from damaged tissue, it was concluded that the analgesic-treated rats gained at least some benefit from the drug treatments, but it was not possible to gauge the extent of this. Handling for examination or treatment may have intensified pain in rats in the control group, and so this should be avoided whenever possible. It is likely that post-surgical pain differs markedly from cancer pain, so a different set of behavioural markers may be needed to assess it effectively. More intensive behaviour monitoring may help to develop a suitable technique for detecting the onset of, and assess the severity of pain that may occur during tumour development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15207040     DOI: 10.1258/002367704323133673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  7 in total

1.  Rat experimental model of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury: an ethical approach to set up the analgesic management of acute post-surgical pain.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Ciuffreda; Valerio Tolva; Renato Casana; Massimiliano Gnecchi; Emilio Vanoli; Carla Spazzolini; John Roughan; Laura Calvillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Concentration-dependent Toxicity after Subcutaneous Administration of Meloxicam to C57BL/6N Mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Anna E Sarfaty; Caroline J Zeiss; Amy D Willis; Jorgen M Harris; Peter C Smith
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Guidelines for the welfare and use of animals in cancer research.

Authors:  P Workman; E O Aboagye; F Balkwill; A Balmain; G Bruder; D J Chaplin; J A Double; J Everitt; D A H Farningham; M J Glennie; L R Kelland; V Robinson; I J Stratford; G M Tozer; S Watson; S R Wedge; S A Eccles
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 4.  A Review of Pain Assessment Methods in Laboratory Rodents.

Authors:  Patricia V Turner; Daniel Sj Pang; Jennifer Ls Lofgren
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 0.982

5.  Real-time application of the Rat Grimace Scale as a welfare refinement in laboratory rats.

Authors:  Vivian Leung; Emily Zhang; Daniel Sj Pang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Using body temperature, food and water consumption as biomarkers of disease progression in mice with Eμ-myc lymphoma.

Authors:  J E Hunter; J Butterworth; N D Perkins; M Bateson; C A Richardson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  The conditioned place preference test for assessing welfare consequences and potential refinements in a mouse bladder cancer model.

Authors:  John V Roughan; Claire A Coulter; Paul A Flecknell; Huw D Thomas; Kenneth J Sufka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.